Obes Surg. 2023 Nov 22. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06951-2. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Poor weight loss and weight regain are principal challenges following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). There is a lack of standardised assessments and diagnostic tests to stratify the status post-LSG and determine whether anatomical or physiological problem exists. We aimed to compare nuclear scintigraphy gastric emptying with CT volumetric analysis of sleeve anatomy and determine the impact of anatomy on physiological function and its correlation with weight loss.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients greater than 12 months post-LSG were categorised into optimal weight loss (OWL) (n = 29) and poor weight loss groups (PWL) (n = 50). All patients underwent a protocolised nuclear scintigraphy and three-dimensional multi-detector computed tomography (3D-MDCT) gastric volumetry imaging.
RESULTS: Post-operative % total weight loss in OWL was 26.2 ± 10.5% vs. 14.2 ± 10.7% in the PWL group (p value < 0.0001). The PWL group had significantly more delayed gastric emptying half-time than OWL (34.1 ± 18.8 vs. 19.5 ± 4.7, p value < 0.0001). Gastric emptying half-time showed statistically significant correlations with weight loss parameters (BMI; r = 0.215, p value 0.048, %EWL; r = – 0.336, p value 0.002 and %TWL; r = – 0.379, p value < 0.001). The median gastric volume on 3D-MDCT did not differ between the OWL (246 (IQR 50) ml) and PWL group (262 (IQR 129.5) ml), p value 0.515. Nuclear scintigraphy gastric emptying half-time was the most highly discriminant measure. A threshold of 21.2 min distinguished OWL from PWL patients with 86.4% sensitivity and 68.4% specificity.
CONCLUSION: Nuclear scintigraphy is a potentially highly accurate tool in the functional assessment of sleeve gastrectomy physiology. It appears to perform better as a diagnostic test than volumetric assessment. Gastric volume did not correlate with weight loss outcomes. We have established diagnostic criteria of greater than 21 min to assess sleeve failure, which is linked to suboptimal weight loss outcomes.
PMID:37991711 | DOI:10.1007/s11695-023-06951-2
