ASAIO J. 2024 Feb 22. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002161. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been increasingly implanted in pediatric patients. Paracorporeal VADs are generally chosen when intracorporeal continuous (IC) devices are too large. Superiority between IC and paracorporeal pulsatile (PP) devices remains unclear in smaller pediatric patients. Our study analyzes outcomes of IC and PP VADs in pediatric patients who could be considered for either of these options. Using the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) database, we identified children between 10 and 30 kg who received a VAD between June 2018 and September 2021. Survival and stroke outcomes were analyzed based on VAD type. There were 41 patients in the IC group and 54 patients in the PP group. Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) profile at the time of implant was higher in the PP cohort (p < 0.02). The PP cohort was younger (p < 0.001) and smaller (p < 0.001) than the IC cohort. The diagnosis was similar between cohorts. Overall survival was similar between groups. Stroke was more common in the PP cohort, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). Discharge was possible only in the IC group, but the discharge rate was low (9.5%). Direct comparisons remain challenging given differences in INTERMACS profiles, age, and size.
PMID:38393712 | DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002161
