Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Changes in Use of Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antivirals After Access Restrictions Were Eased by State Medicaid Programs

JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240302. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0302.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are safe and highly effective for curing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but their high cost led certain state Medicaid programs to impose coverage restrictions. Since 2015, many of these restrictions have been lifted voluntarily in response to advocacy or because of litigation.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate how the prescribing of DAAs to Medicaid patients changed after states eased access restrictions.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This modified difference-in-differences analysis of 39 state Medicaid programs included Medicaid beneficiaries who were prescribed a DAA from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. DAA coverage restrictions were measured based on a series of cross-sectional assessments performed from 2014 through 2022 by the US National Viral Hepatitis Roundtable and the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation.

EXPOSURE: Calendar quarter when states eased or eliminated 3 types of DAA coverage restrictions: limiting treatment to patients with severe liver disease, restricting use among patients with active substance use, and requiring prescriptions to be written by or in consultation with specialists. States with none of these restrictions at baseline were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Quarterly number of HCV DAA treatment courses per 100 000 Medicaid beneficiaries.

RESULTS: Of 39 states, 7 (18%) eliminated coverage restrictions, 25 (64%) eased restrictions, and 7 (18%) maintained the same restrictions from 2015 to 2019. During this period, the average quarterly use of DAAs increased from 669 to 3601 treatment courses per 100 000 Medicaid beneficiaries. After states eased or eliminated restrictions, the use of DAAs increased by 966 (95% CI, 409-1523) treatment courses per 100 000 Medicaid beneficiaries each quarter compared with states that did not ease or eliminate restrictions.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest that there was greater use of DAAs after states relaxed coverage restrictions related to liver disease severity, sobriety, or prescriber specialty. Further reductions or elimination of these rules may improve access to a highly effective public health intervention for patients with HCV.

PMID:38578628 | DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0302

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala