J Neurosurg. 2024 Apr 5:1-9. doi: 10.3171/2024.1.JNS232173. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cerebral infarction is a common complication in patients undergoing revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease (MMD). Although previous statistical evaluations have identified several risk factors for postoperative brain ischemia, the ability to predict its occurrence based on these limited predictors remains inadequately explored. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of machine learning algorithms for predicting cerebral infarction after revascularization surgery in patients with MMD.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted across two centers and harnessed data from 512 patients with MMD who had undergone revascularization surgery. The patient cohort was partitioned into internal and external datasets. Using perioperative clinical data from the internal cohort, three distinct machine learning algorithms-namely the support vector machine, random forest, and light gradient-boosting machine models-were trained and cross-validated to predict the occurrence of postoperative cerebral infarction. Predictive performance validity was subsequently assessed using an external dataset. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to augment the prediction model’s transparency and to quantify the impact of each input variable on shaping both the aggregate and individual patient predictions.
RESULTS: In the cohort of 512 patients, 33 (6.4%) experienced postrevascularization cerebral infarction. The cross-validation outcomes revealed that, among the three models, the support vector machine model achieved the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) at mean ± SD 0.785 ± 0.052. Notably, during external validation, the light gradient-boosting machine model exhibited the highest accuracy at 0.903 and the largest ROC-AUC at 0.710. The top-performing prediction model utilized five input variables: postoperative serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase value, positive posterior cerebral artery (PCA) involvement on preoperative MRA, infarction as the rationale for surgery, presence of an infarction scar on preoperative MRI, and preoperative modified Rankin Scale score. Furthermore, the SHAP analysis identified presence of PCA involvement, infarction as the rationale for surgery, and presence of an infarction scar on preoperative MRI as positive influences on postoperative cerebral infarction.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates the usefulness of employing machine learning techniques with routine perioperative data to predict the occurrence of cerebral infarction after revascularization procedures in patients with MMD.
PMID:38579355 | DOI:10.3171/2024.1.JNS232173
