J Phys Chem B. 2024 Apr 5. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c07447. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
We critically assess the capabilities of classical density functional theory (DFT) based on the perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory (PC-SAFT) equation of state to predict the solvation free energies of small molecules in various hydrocarbon solvents. We compare DFT results with experimental data from the Minnesota solvation database and utilize statistical methods to analyze the accuracy of our approach, as well as its weaknesses. The mean absolute error of the solvation free energies is 3.7 kJ mol-1 for n-alkane solvents, ranging from pentane to hexadecane, with 473 solute-solvent systems. For solvents consisting of cyclic hydrocarbons (cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene) with 245 solute-solvent systems, we report a slightly larger mean absolute error of 4.2 kJ mol-1. We identify three possible sources of errors: (i) the neglect of solute-solvent and solvent-solvent Coulomb interactions, which limits the applicability of PC-SAFT DFT to nonpolar and weakly polar molecules; (ii) the solute’s Lennard-Jones parameters supplied by the general AMBER force field, which are not parametrized toward solvation free energies; and (iii) the application of the Lorentz-Berthelot combining rules to the dispersive interactions between a segment of the PC-SAFT solvent and a Lennard-Jones interaction site of the solute. The approach is more accurate than standard implementations of phenomenological models in common chemistry software packages, which exhibit mean absolute errors larger than 9.12 kJ mol-1, even though newer phenomenological models achieve a mean absolute error of about 2 kJ mol-1. PC-SAFT DFT is more computationally efficient than state of the art explicit molecular simulations in combination with free energy perturbation methods. It is predictive with respect to solvation free energies, i.e., the input for the model is the (element-specific) molecular force field, the solute configuration from molecular dynamics simulations, and the (substance-specific) PC-SAFT parameters. The PC-SAFT parametrization uses pure-component data and does not require experimental solvation free energies. The PC-SAFT equation of state, without applying a DFT formalism, can also be used to calculate solvation free energies, provided that the PC-SAFT parameters for the solute are available. A large number of substances was recently parametrized by members of our group (Esper, T.; Bauer, G.; Rehner, P.; Gross, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62), which enables a comparison to the DFT approach for 103 substances. Accurate results are obtained from the PC-SAFT equation of state with an MAE below 2.51 kJ mol-1. The DFT approach does not require PC-SAFT parameters for the solute and can be applied to all solutes that can be represented by the molecular force field.
PMID:38579126 | DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c07447
