Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Apr 2;13(4):23. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.4.23.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The common protocol of full-field stimulus threshold (FST) testing recommends pupil dilation. The aim of this study is to investigate the difference between FST measurements with dilated and nondilated pupils in healthy subjects and patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects and 20 RP patients were selected. One pupil of each subject was dilated; the other eye was measured in physiological width of the pupil. The FST was conducted using Diagnosys Espion E2/E3 with white, blue, and red stimuli. Statistical analysis was conducted with a mixed-model analysis of variance and a paired t-test.
RESULTS: The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between measurements of dilated and nondilated pupils with the following: blue stimuli for all subjects and groups except those with highly progressed RP; white stimuli for all tested subjects in total, for RP patients with better-preserved visual field (VF), and rod-mediated FST response; and red stimuli for RP patients with better-preserved VF and rod-mediated FST response. On average, the difference between the FST values for RP patients were -3.2 ± 3 dB for blue, -2.3 ± 2.9 dB for white, and -0.83 ± 3 dB for red stimuli. The correlation between the FST values of dilated and nondilated pupils with all three stimuli was linear.
CONCLUSIONS: Current recommendations are to perform FST with dilated pupils. However, based on this study’s findings, pupil dilation can be omitted for clinical diagnostics or rough follow-ups.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Our data provide useful information for the clinical use of FST.
PMID:38630470 | DOI:10.1167/tvst.13.4.23
