J Neurosurg. 2024 Apr 26:1-7. doi: 10.3171/2024.1.JNS232342. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) is the gold-standard technique for intraoperative evaluation of the extent of resection in brain tumor surgery. Unfortunately, it is currently available at only a few neurosurgical centers. A commercially available software, Virtual iMRI Cranial, provides an elastic fusion between preoperative MRI and intraoperative CT (iCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this software in determining the presence of residual tumor.
METHODS: Virtual iMRI was performed in patients who underwent iCT after intracranial tumor resection. The results of the software in terms of presence or absence of tumor residual were then compared with postoperative MRI performed within 48 hours after surgery to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of virtual iMRI.
RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included in the present study. The virtual iMRI findings were concordant with the postoperative MRI data in 35 cases (53%) in the detection of tumor residual (p = 0.006). No false-negative findings (i.e., presence of residual on postoperative MRI and absence of residual on virtual iMRI) were encountered. Virtual iMRI had a sensitivity of 1 (95% CI 0.86-1), specificity of 0.26 (95% CI 0.14-0.42), positive predictive value of 0.44 (95% CI 0.3-0.58), and negative predictive value of 1 (95% CI 0.72-1). Subgroup analysis revealed that the virtual iMRI findings were concordant with postoperative MRI findings in all cases (n = 9) of lower-grade glioma (LGG) with a sensitivity of 1 (95% CI 0.59-1) and a specificity of 1 (95% CI 0.16-1) (p = 0.003); a statistically significant association was also found for grade 4 gliomas with a sensitivity of 1 (95% CI 0.69-1) and a specificity of 0.33 (95% CI 0.08-0.7) (p = 0.046) (19 patients). No significant association was found when considering meningiomas or metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: The commercially available virtual iMRI can predict the presence or absence of tumor residual with high sensitivity. The diagnostic accuracy of this method was higher in LGGs and much lower for meningiomas or metastases; these findings must be evaluated in prospective studies in a larger population.
PMID:38669708 | DOI:10.3171/2024.1.JNS232342
