Clin Radiol. 2024 Oct 3:S0009-9260(24)00564-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.018. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate radiation dose among physicians, nurses, nuclear medicine (NM) technicians, and radiographers at a single institution and to compare the difference in the measured dose during COVID-19 with other periods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the occupational radiation doses received by all workers in diagnostic radiography and NM departments at a single institution during a 5-year period (2018-2022) was performed. Dose measurements were recorded for 94 radiology personnel: radiographers, NM technicians, physicians, and nurses. In addition to descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the average annual effective dose between male and female workers and between the periods before and during COVID-19. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare effective radiation doses from different quadrants.
RESULTS: The annual average effective doses were found to be between 0.58 and 0.72 mSv for males and 0.68 and 0.85 mSv for females. All radiographers, 86% of nurses, and 69% of physicians have received annual average effective doses below 0.99 mSv. The average annual effective doses for all radiation workers were similar in the period before COVID-19 when compared to the period during COVID-19 except for nurses who had significantly lower (P<0.05) doses before COVID-19.
CONCLUSION: The average annual effective doses of radiation workers during 2018-2022 were well below the annual dose limit. A relatively higher average effective dose was received among NM technicians compared with other radiation occupational workers. While the caseload during the COVID-19 pandemic was lower due to government policies, the radiation dose to healthcare workers during the pandemic was similar to that before the pandemic.
PMID:39462717 | DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.09.018
