BMC Med Educ. 2026 Apr 27. doi: 10.1186/s12909-026-09045-6. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In dentistry, moral judgment skills are a fundamental competency that helps dentists make the best decisions when faced with challenging clinical problems and ethical dilemmas. The aim was toexamine the moral sensitivity levels of fourth- and fifth-grade dentistry students and orthodontic clinicians.
METHODS: The study included fourth-grade (n = 116) and fifth-grade dentistry students (n = 106) as well as orthodontic clinicians, including residents and specialists (n = 117). Data were collected using a sociodemographic form and the self-administered Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ) including six sub-dimensions: autonomy, holistic approach, conflict, orientation, providing benefit, and application. Participants were asked to rate the questionnaire on a 7-point Likert-type scale. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used in reliability analysis. Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage. Intergroup differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons were further identified with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Two-way ANOVA was performed to assess the combined effects of group and demographic variables on the total scale score.
RESULTS: The overall reliability of the MSQ scale was 0.84. The total moral sensitivity scores for fourth-grade, fifth-grade students, and orthodontic clinicians were 92.7 ± 15.7, 92.4 ± 17.8, and 93.8 ± 14.4, respectively, revealing no statistically significant difference. Fifth-grade students scored significantly lower than orthodontic clinicians on the Holistic Approach and Conflict sub-dimensions but scored significantly higher on the Orientation sub-dimension compared to orthodontic clinicians.
CONCLUSIONS: Undergraduate dentistry students and orthodontic clinicians exhibited moderate levels of moral sensitivity. Fifth-grade students were found to have higher moral sensitivity thanorthodontic clinicians on the holistic approach and conflict sub-dimensions, while orthodontic clinicians were found to be more sensitive on the orientation sub-dimension. These differences suggest that integrating case-based ethics training into the dental curriculum, regardless of academic year, can help students better identify ethical issues and develop strategies to address them effectively.
PMID:42036666 | DOI:10.1186/s12909-026-09045-6
