Stud Health Technol Inform. 2026 May 7;335:163-168. doi: 10.3233/SHTI260077.
ABSTRACT
Standardized care plans are essential for improving care quality, enabling consistent care delivery and seamless data exchange across care settings. However, the extent to which existing care planning tools implement standards, like HL7 FHIR, remains unclear. This study evaluates existing care planning tools through a fit-gap analysis assessing their alignment with standardized, interoperable care plan requirements and identify gaps hindering standardization and system integration. Tools were evaluated based on standard compliance, particularly FHIR, output capabilities, geographical origin, and accessibility patterns. Nine tools demonstrated full FHIR compliance, two partial implementation, and five no explicit FHIR support. Geographic analysis revealed US and Australian tools exhibited higher FHIR implementation rates than European solutions. Only seven tools achieved the “fit” criterion of combining care planning functionality with full FHIR compliance. No tools from Asia, Africa, or South America were identified, suggesting global gaps in access to standardized care planning technologies. These findings highlight geographic disparities in interoperability standards adoption and a need for policy interventions, particularly in Europe and underrepresented regions.
PMID:42119113 | DOI:10.3233/SHTI260077
