Gen Dent. 2026 Jul-Aug;74(4):21-26.
ABSTRACT
This study evaluated and compared the perceptions of general dentists, pediatric dentists, and orthodontists regarding the need for transverse maxillary expansion for Class I malocclusions with posterior crossbite. An electronic survey consisting of digitally manipulated intraoral images depicting 8 clinical scenarios was distributed to 10,000 general dentists, 8734 pediatric dentists, and 2400 orthodontists. A total of 566 practitioners responded (2.7% response rate): 85 general dentists, 339 pediatric dentists, and 142 orthodontists. For each case, participants assessed the need for expansion, type of expansion, and referral preferences. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression, which were adjusted for specialty, years of experience, and geographic region. Significant differences in perception were observed in 6 of the 8 cases (P < 0.05), primarily influenced by specialty training. Orthodontists demonstrated significantly higher odds of recommending expansion than general dentists, particularly in more complex presentations. Pediatric dentists more frequently opted for referral rather than treatment. Neither years of practice nor geographic region significantly influenced diagnostic decisions. Survey reliability demonstrated moderate to substantial agreement across repeated cases (κ = 0.424 to 0.677), and power analysis indicated sufficient sample size and effect sizes for most scenarios. These findings suggest that specialty training strongly influences the perceived need for transverse maxillary expansion, highlighting a potential need for enhanced orthodontic diagnostic education in dental and pediatric residency programs to promote consistency in the diagnosis and management of transverse discrepancies across dental specialties.
PMID:42329609
