Acta Oncol. 2026 Jul 27;65:624-631. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45981.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare follow-up preferences and health-related quality of life between newly operated endometrial cancer patients and those already enrolled in a traditional hospital-based follow-up program, and to explore whether preferences differ depending on follow-up experience. Patient/material and methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, patients who underwent primary surgery for endometrial cancer in northern Sweden were included. Group 1 consisted of newly operated patients recruited before entering follow-up, and Group 2 included patients already participating in the standard hospital-based follow-up program. Participants completed questionnaires on sociodemographic characteristics, follow-up preferences, and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30). Clinical data were obtained from medical records. The primary outcome was follow-up preference; secondary outcomes included quality of life and associations with clinical and demographic variables.
RESULTS: Of the 121 invited patients, 92 (76%) responded, and 90 were included in the analysis (48 in Group 1; 42 in Group 2). The groups were comparable in baseline characteristics. Newly operated patients demonstrated more diverse follow-up preferences, with 51.1% preferring physician-led hospital visits compared to 82.9% in Group 2 (p = 0.035). Global quality of life did not differ significantly (p = 0.165), although Group 1 reported lower functional scores, particularly in role and emotional functioning. Appetite loss was the only symptom that differed significantly between groups.
INTERPRETATION: Newly operated patients are more open to alternative follow-up models despite similar overall quality of life. Integrating patient preferences into follow-up care may enhance personalization and sustainability.
PMID:42504700 | DOI:10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45981
