J Robot Surg. 2026 Aug 3;20(1):786. doi: 10.1007/s11701-026-03764-0.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Telesurgery has emerged as a transformative approach to address geographic disparities in surgical care, particularly in urology. However, robust real-world evidence specifically focused on renal procedures remains limited. We conducted this systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and perioperative outcomes of remote robot-assisted renal surgery.
METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to July 1, 2026. Studies reporting robot-assisted telesurgery for renal procedures (partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, or renal cyst decortication) were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Case Series Checklist was used for quality assessment. A single-arm meta-analysis with random-effects models was performed to pool surgical success rates, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), warm ischemia time (WIT), and network parameters. Subgroup analyses were conducted by sample size, study design, and robotic platform. Sensitivity analyses using the leave-one-out method were performed to test the robustness of the pooled estimates.
RESULTS: Eight studies comprising 98 patients were included. All studies were of moderate-to-high methodological quality (JBI scores: 8-10/10). The pooled surgical success rate was 100%, with a local surgeon take-over rate of 2.1% (2/98). No Clavien-Dindo grade III or IV complications were reported. The pooled estimates were: operative time 99.52 min (95% CI: 77.10-121.94; I² = 92.5%), EBL 28.30 mL (95% CI: 18.18-38.41; I² = 87.9%), LOS 5.31 days (95% CI: 3.29-7.33; I² = 98.0%), and WIT (for partial nephrectomy) 21.14 min (95% CI: 17.76-24.53; I² = 0.6%). Network parameters remained below the 200-300 ms safety threshold, with a mean round-trip time of 51.79 ms (95% CI: 1.25-102.34) and maximum latency of 128.26 ms (95% CI: 95.38-161.13). Subgroup analyses by robotic platform revealed significant between-group differences for operative time (p = 0.000) and EBL (p = 0.000), but not for LOS (p = 0.703). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimates for operative time and EBL, whereas the LOS estimate was sensitive to the inclusion of studies reporting extreme values.
CONCLUSIONS: Remote robot-assisted renal surgery demonstrates high technical success rates, low complication rates, and favorable perioperative outcomes, with network parameters well within established safety thresholds. These findings support the clinical implementation of telesurgery for appropriately selected renal surgery patients, particularly in underserved regions. However, the substantial heterogeneity observed highlights the need for large-scale, prospective comparative studies with standardized outcome definitions and longer follow-up.
PMID:42545600 | DOI:10.1007/s11701-026-03764-0
