Crit Care Sci. 2026 Aug 3;38:e20260480. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20260480. eCollection 2026.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the effect of a short period of invasive mechanical ventilation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial, compared with immediate extubation, on the risk of reintubation within 48 hours.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing a short period of invasive mechanical ventilation following a successful spontaneous breathing trial versus immediate extubation. We searched PubMed®, Cochrane Central, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Pairs of reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. The primary outcome was reintubation within 48 hours after randomization. Data were pooled using a Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects model. Trial sequential analysis was performed to determine whether the accumulated evidence was sufficient for definitive conclusions. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Secondary outcomes were reintubation or death within 7 days after extubation, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and ventilator-free days up to day 28.
RESULTS: Our search identified 1,473 unique records, of which 4 randomized clinical trials (n = 1,071 patients) were eligible. The pooled risk ratio for reintubation within 48 hours in patients receiving a short period of invasive mechanical ventilation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial, compared with immediate extubation, was 0.48 (95% confidence interval 0.22 – 1.07; p = 0.06; I2 = 41.6%). Trial sequential analysis confirmed that the current evidence base is underpowered for definitive conclusions. The evidence was rated as low due to serious inconsistency and imprecision. No significant differences were observed for any of the secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults, a short period of invasive mechanical ventilation after a successful spontaneous breathing trial did not significantly reduce the risk of extubation failure within 48 hours compared with immediate extubation (low-certainty evidence). Further adequately powered trials are needed to clarify the clinical efficacy of this intervention.
PMID:42561371 | DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20260480
