Med J Malaysia. 2026 Jul;81(4):577-585.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Self-care behaviour, motivation, and selfefficacy represent related but distinct dimensions of hypertension self-management. Previous Indonesian studies have generally examined self-care behaviour as the primary outcome or treated motivation and self-efficacy as its explanatory factors. Evidence describing the outcomespecific associations of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with these three domains remains limited. This study examined the associations of selected sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with self-care behaviour, motivation, and self-efficacy among adults with hypertension.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analytical cross-sectional study included 120 adults with hypertension attending the Gianyar 1 Community Health Centre, Bali, Indonesia, between August and September 2024. Participants were selected from an eligible patient registry using simple random sampling. Self-care behaviour, motivation, and selfefficacy were measured using the validated Indonesian version of the High Blood Pressure Self-Care Profile. Bivariate comparisons were followed by three separate multiple linear regression models.
RESULTS: The mean scores were 44.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] 42.44-45.74) for self-care behaviour, 44.64 (95% CI 42.56-46.72) for motivation, and 42.99 (95% CI 41.21- 44.78) for self-efficacy. The self-care behaviour model was statistically significant (R2=0.375; adjusted R2=0.304; p<0.001). Higher self-care behaviour scores were observed among participants aged 41-50 years and private-sector employees, whereas lower scores were observed among participants with no formal schooling, junior high school education, and a hypertension duration of 1-5 years. The motivation model was also statistically significant but had lower explanatory value (R2=0.186; adjusted R2=0.094; p=0.028). Participants aged 41-50 years had higher motivation scores, whereas those with junior high school education had lower scores. The overall self-efficacy model was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Associations were observed mainly for selfcare behaviour and motivation, whereas the examined characteristics did not collectively explain self-efficacy. These findings support individualised assessment of behavioural, motivational, and confidence-related needs in primary care. Causal relationships cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional study.
PMID:42584449
