Categories
Nevin Manimala Statistics

Procedure-Specific Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Breast Surgery: A Propensity-Score Adjusted Analysis of 5,202 Procedures

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2026 May 19. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000013206. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hematoma remains a major complication following breast surgery. While tranexamic acid (TXA) efficacy is established in reduction mammaplasty, its utility across other breast procedures remains unclear.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 5,202 consecutive procedures (2019-2025) performed by multiple surgeons at a single private hospital: primary augmentation (n=3,738), reduction mammaplasty (n=943), explantation with mastopexy (n=358), and explantation alone (n=163). TXA administration was at surgeon discretion. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting controlled for temporal adoption bias and confounders. Primary outcome was hematoma requiring surgical intervention within 30 days; isolated ecchymosis without palpable collection was not classified as hematoma.

RESULTS: TXA adoption increased from 7.0% (2019) to 93.0% (2025). After achieving covariate balance (all SMD <0.2), procedure-specific effects emerged. In reduction mammaplasty, TXA significantly reduced hematoma (2.2% vs 7.2%; adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.58, p<0.001; NNT=20). Explantation with mastopexy showed similar benefit (1.6% vs 6.0%; OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.88, p<0.001). Primary augmentation demonstrated no statistically detectable difference (1.2% vs 1.2%; OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.36-2.42, p=0.905), regardless of implant plane. No thromboembolic events occurred. Surgical site infection showed a nominally significant difference (OR 0.47, p=0.02) but should be considered exploratory given small event counts and absence of a plausible biological mechanism. Seroma and wound dehiscence showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS: TXA efficacy is procedure-dependent. It provides significant protection in reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy involving extensive parenchymal dissection, but shows no statistically detectable benefit in primary augmentation. These findings support procedure-specific practice guidance rather than universal prophylaxis.

PMID:42154472 | DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000013206

By Nevin Manimala

Portfolio Website for Nevin Manimala