Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Aug 30. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8872. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate YouTube content about metoidioplasty on completeness of perioperative information, actionability, understandability, degree of misinformation, quality, and presence of commercial bias.
METHODS: A YouTube search for “Metoidioplasty” was conducted and the first 100 video results were watched by five independent reviewers. Videos in English <30 minutes in length were included and videos primarily showing surgical footage were excluded. Videos were evaluated between January 2022 and June 2022. Each video was evaluated for presenter demographics, channel/video statistics, and whether it covered topics including anatomy, treatment options, outcomes, procedure risks, and misinformation, and whether it had a clickbait title. Calculated scores for validated DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) metrics were the primary outcome variables used to quantify quality, actionability, and understandability. For PEMAT, a cutoff of 75% was used to differentiate between “poor” versus “good/sufficient.” Multivariate and univariate logistic regressions were performed to assess correlations among primary outcome variables and other variables.
RESULTS: Of the 79 videos analyzed, 24% (n=19) were of high quality; 99% (n=78) had poor understandability and 100% (n=79%) had poor actionability. Patients/consumers were the most common publisher type (n=71, 90%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates metoidioplasty content available on YouTube is not comprehensive and is of poor quality, and poor actionability and understandability, demonstrating a clear need for more relevant, accessible, comprehensible, and accurate content.
PMID:39470663 | DOI:10.5489/cuaj.8872
