Brain Spine. 2026 Jul 1;6:106157. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2026.106157. eCollection 2026.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Treatment-refractory chronic pain is a prevalent condition affecting a significant portion of the population. Available treatment strategies range from non-invasive to invasive approaches, including several surgical procedures. The most commonly reported intracranial neurosurgical interventions are deep brain stimulation (DBS) and ablative techniques such as cingulotomy, thalamotomy, and mesencephalotomy.
RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different intracranial surgical treatments for refractory chronic pain through a systematic review and meta-analysis, focusing on quantitative trends in clinical pain outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS: In total, 75 studies including 666 patients that underwent at least one surgical procedure, with nearly half achieving significant pain reduction (>50%). A meta-analysis compared surgical treatments; where mesencephalotomy was excluded due to insufficient data. Pain levels at baseline were compared at four follow-up periods: T1 (≤1 month), T2 (>1-≤6 months), T3 (>6-≤12 months), and T4 (>12 months). Wilcoxon tests demonstrated statistically significant differences between baseline and the latest follow-up for all included methods: DBS: p < 0.001, g = 1.44 85-90%; cingulotomy: p < 0.001, g = 2.6 > 95%; thalamotomy: p < 0.001, g = 0.92 ≈ 74%. Comparisons between follow-up time points were possible only for DBS, which also showed significant differences (p < 0.05).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that intracranial surgical procedures for chronic pain are effective/safe and may maintain their clinical benefit for months following treatment. Furthermore, substantial variability in clinical outcomes was observed, even after stratification according to etiology and target groups.
PMID:42472183 | PMC:PMC13380498 | DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2026.106157