Nebraska high school baseball statistics leaders | Baseball – Omaha World-Herald

Nebraska high school baseball statistics leaders | Baseball - Omaha World-Herald nevin manimala

Nebraska high school baseball statistics leaders, as published in The World-Herald on April 13.

Batting average

Class A: Olson, Omaha Burke, .600; Wize, Omaha Burke, .565; Forte, Omaha Central, .560; Lorenzen, Omaha Burke, .550; Martin, Lincoln High, .538; Sullivan, Omaha Central, .531; Juhlin, Elkhorn South, .519; Brown, Omaha Northwest, .516; Miller, Kearney, .500; Zimmerman, Lincoln East, .500; Callahan, Fremont Bergan, .467; Peek, Omaha Northeast, .462; Evans, Grand Island, .448; McNeil, Lincoln High, .448; Klenda, Omaha Burke, .448; Tonnies, Omaha Northwest, .444; Curran, Omaha Westside, .444; Shiers, Kearney, .438; Urban, Millard South, .435; Mungin, Millard South, .435; Spurgeon, Bellevue East, .433; Barnett, Papillion-La Vista, .431; Tagge, Omaha Westside, .429; Standish, Millard West, .429; Sellon, Lincoln East, .429; Shuhmacher, Papillion-La Vista South, .429; Faltys, Norfolk, .429.

Class B: Vogt, Thurston-Cuming County, .733; Kubasik, Elkhorn Mount Michael, .632; DeMayo, Elkhorn Mount Michael, .600; McKay, Omaha Roncalli, .545; Torosian, Omaha Concordia, .522; Mathewson, Platteview, .515; Rodgers, Omaha Roncalli, .500; Hesser, Wahoo, .500; Cordes, Elkhorn Mount Michael, .500; Sailors, Ralston, .481; Washburn, Platte Valley, .481; Arnett, Arlington, .474; Kavelage, Hastings, .474; Raison, Auburn, .470; Harris, Ralston, .462; Urbom, Branched Oak, .458; Boeve, Hastings, .458; Steinmeyer, Waverly, .452; Kanzmeier, Omaha Concordia, .450; Bartos, Wayne, .444.

Class A: Barnett, Papillion-La Vista, 22; Olson, Omaha Burke, 18; Sullivan, Omaha Central, 17; Anderson, Millard West, 17; Gerdes, Millard South, 17; Anderson, Bellevue West, 16; Tagge, Omaha Westside, 15; Denne, Papillion-La Vista South, 15; Standish, Millard West, 15; Vermaas, Millard North, 14; Lemon, Bellevue West, 14; Reetz, Elkhorn South, 14; Brown, Omaha Northwest, 14; Juhlin, Elkhorn South, 14.

Class B: Mathewson, Platteview, 17; DeMayo, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 17; Steinmeyer, Waverly, 14; Bliss, Wahoo, 14; Prososki, Bennington, 13; Washburn, Platte Valley, 13; Thomas, Platteview, 12; Randazzo, Elkhorn, 12; Harris, Ralston, 12; Sailors, Ralston, 12; Hesser, Wahoo, 12; Kubasik, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 12; Jordon, Waverly, 11; Mathewson, Platteview, 11; Darnell, Auburn, 11; Osborn, Norris, 11; Baker, Norris, 11; Urbom, Branched Oak, 11; Boeve, Hastings, 11; Torosian, Omaha Concordia, 11.

Sign up for daily headlines from NEPrepZone

Get a daily roundup of game recaps, player features and more in your inbox.

Class A: Tagge, Omaha Westside, 14; Juhlin, Elkhorn South, 14; Reetz, Elkhorn South, 13; Holloway, Bellevue East, 12; Anderson, Millard West, 11; Olson, Omaha Burke, 11; Lorenzen, Omaha Burke, 11; Stegman, Omaha Westside, 11; Anglim, Papillion-La Vista, 11; Whitehill, Papillion-La Vista, 11; Evans, Grand Island, 11; Sullivan, Omaha Central, 11; Greise, Millard South, 10; Wright, Millard West, 10; Waller, Papillion-La Vista South, 10; Sullivan, Bellevue West, 10; Schneider, Bellevue West, 10; Peek, Omaha Northwest, 10; Weber, Millard North, 10.

Class B: DeMayo, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 22; Steinmeyer, Waverly, 18; Boeve, Hastings, 17; Randazzo, Elkhorn, 13; Hesser, Wahoo, 12; Smith, Bennington, 11; Baker, Norris, 11; Rodgers, Omaha Roncalli, 11; Kubasik, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 11; Harris, Ralston, 10; McKay, Omaha Roncalli, 10; Prososki, Bennington, 9; Therkildsen, Fort Calhoun, 9; Thomas, Platteview, 8; Hostetler, Crete, 8; Kennedy, Platteview, 8; Kozal, Waverly, 8.

Class A: Barnett, Papillion-La Vista, 16; Sullivan, Omaha Central, 16; Gerdes, Millard South, 16; Stegman, Omaha Westside, 15; Olson, Omaha Burke, 14; Schuyler, Bellevue East, 14; Brown, Omaha Northwest, 14; Standish, Millard West, 13; Skoff, Bellevue East, 13; Forte, Omaha Central, 13; Anderson, Millard West, 12; Vermaas, Millard North, 12; Anglim, Papillion-La Vista, 12; Campin, Omaha Burke, 12; Reinert, Omaha Westside, 11; Goetzmann, Millard North, 11; Loewe, Lincoln High, 11; Gish, Elkhorn South, 11; Tonnies, Omaha Northwest, 11.

Class B: Collins, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 16; Creech, Hastings, 14; Mathewson, Platteview, 11; Randazzo, Elkhorn, 11; Carter, Waverly, 11; Simmerman, Seward, 11; Osborn, Norris, 11; Wallingford, Bennington, 10; Lavigne, Auburn, 10; Price, Norris, 10; Urbom, Branched Oak, 10; Kubasik, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 10; Von Rentzell, Platte Valley, 10; Smith, Bennington, 9; Krause, Seward, 9; Benes, Norris, 9; Bierman, Omaha Concordia, 9; Hesser, Wahoo, 9.

Class A: Gerdes, Millard South, 6; Forte, Omaha Central, 6; Anderson, Millard West, 5; Scruggs, Papillion-La Vista, 5; Greise, Millard South, 5; Sellon, Lincoln East, 5; Mitchell, Omaha Burke, 5; Schlader, Omaha North, 5; Stegman, Omaha Westside, 4; Anderson, Bellevue West, 4; Tagge, Omaha Westside, 4; Denne, Papillion-La Vista South, 4; Reetz, Elkhorn South, 4; Wright, Millard West, 4; Fox, Lincoln Southwest, 4; Spurgeon, Bellevue East, 4; McNeil, Lincoln High, 4; Lodice, Millard West, 4; Evans, Grand Island, 4; Schneider, Bellevue West, 4; Thompson, Columbus, 4; Miller, Kearney, 4.

Class B: Jordon, Waverly, 7; Osborn, Norris, 7; DeMayo, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 7; Smith, Bennington, 6; Peery, Seward, 5; Thomas, Platteview, 4; Prososki, Bennington, 4; Harris, Ralston, 4; Baker, Norris, 4; Urbom, Branched Oak, 4; Costello, Ralston, 4; Torosian, Omaha Concordia, 4; Smaileys, Arlington, 4; Emanuel, Omaha Skutt, 4; Washburn, Platte Valley, 4.

Class A: Olson, Omaha Burke, 5; Diederich, Elkhorn South, 3; Anderson, Bellevue West, 2; Tagge, Omaha Westside, 2; Herink, Fremont Bergan, 2; Barnett, Papillion-La Vista, 2; Spurgeon, Bellevue East, 2; Unzicker, Millard South, 2.

Class B: Oswald, Omaha Skutt, 3; Boeve, Hastings, 2; Mathewson, Platteview, 2; Steinmeyer, Waverly, 2; Randazzo, Elkhorn, 2.

Class A: Randall, Lincoln Southwest, 4; Anderson, Millard West, 3; McNeil, Lincoln High, 3; Skoff, Bellevue East, 2; Gish, Elkhorn South, 2.

Class B: Rodgers, Omaha Roncalli, 2; McKay, Omaha Roncalli, 1; Brown, Waverly, 1; Flynn, Bennington, 1; Ahrens, Wahoo, 1; Kozal, Waverly, 1; Lewis, Platte Valley, 1; Holtorf, Seward, 1; Harris, Ralston, 1; Price, Norris, 1; Benes, Norris, 1; Kozal, Waverly, 1; Stauffer, Crete, 1; Hostetler, Crete, 1; Page, Crete, 1; Coffey, Crete, 1; Urbom, Branched Oak, 1; Costello, Ralston, 1; Smaileys, Arlington, 1; Konkler, Plattsmouth, 1; Therkildsen, Fort Calhoun, 1; Nickel, Branched Oak, 1; Blotzer, Plattsmouth, 1; Kubasik, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 1.

Stolen bases

Class A: Brown, Omaha Northwest, 12; Ripa, Papillion-La Vista, 10; Gomes, Millard West, 9; Barnett, Papillion-La Vista, 9; Anglim, Papillion-La Vista, 9; Gerdes, Millard South, 7; Schuyler, Bellevue East, 7; Hagen, Omaha North, 7; Jessen, Elkhorn South, 7; Skoff, Bellevue East, 6; Chudomelka, Bellevue East, 6; Fritz, Bellevue East, 6; Juhlin, Elkhorn South, 6; Reetz, Elkhorn South, 6; Bell, Lincoln East, 6; Urban, Millard South, 6; Frederick, Lincoln Southwest, 6; Petersen, Lincoln Southwest, 6; Sartori, Lincoln Southwest, 5; Lodice, Millard West, 5.

Class B: Vogt, Thurston-Cuming County, 10; Bliss, Wahoo, 8; Bredemeier, Falls City, 7; Washburn, Platte Valley, 7; Hovelsrud, Waverly, 6; Vater, Beatrice, 6; Urbom, Branched Oak, 6; Jordon, Waverly, 6.

Class A: Hagan, Omaha Westside, 3; Nicks, Omaha Burke, 3; Warner, Omaha Burke, 2; Brockett, Elkhorn South, 2; Beran, Gretna, 2; Groskreutz, Kearney, 2; Lakin, Omaha Central, 2; Claybourne, Millard West, 2; Cruz, Grand Island, 2; Riedel, Millard West, 2; Henderson, Omaha Westside, 2; Kreber, Omaha Central, 2; Janssen, Lincoln East, 2; Galligher, Omaha Central, 2; Komor, Millard South, 2; Dix, Fremont Bergan, 2; Luth, Elkhorn South, 2; McNeil, Lincoln High, 2; Colbert, Papillion-La Vista, 2; Payne, Millard South, 2; Diederich, Elkhorn South, 2; Chavis, Omaha Northwest, 2; Hagen, Omaha North, 2; Chudomelka, Bellevue East, 2; Kroeger, Omaha Northwest, 2.

Class B: Smith, Bennington, 3; Rolenc, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 3; Hesser, Wahoo, 3; Zabokrtsky, Beatrice, 3; Reiser, Waverly, 3; Kanzmeier, Omaha Concordia, 3; Comfort, Bennington, 2; Hesser, Wahoo, 2; Olson, Omaha Concordia, 2; Rump, Arlington, 2; Lewis, Platte Valley, 2; Washburn, Platte Valley, 2; Wibbels, Hastings, 2; Shaw, Hastings, 2; Hostetler, Crete, 2; DeMayo, Elkhorn Mount Michael, 2; Sabatka, Wahoo, 2; Wylder, Waverly, 2; Christo, Elkhorn, 2; Adkins, Platteview, 2; Williams, Nebraska City, 2.

Class A: Hawkins, Millard West, 0.00; Lakin, Omaha Central, 0.00; Nicks, Omaha Burke, 0.00; Goodyear, Lincoln East, 0.00; Bland, Papillion-La Vista South, 0.00; Brockett, Elkhorn South, 0.44; Riedel, Millard West, 0.52; Allen, Bellevue West, 0.67; Groskreutz, Kearney, 0.76; Foresman, Papillion-La Vista South, 0.78; Warner, Omaha Burke, 0.82; Beran, Gretna, 1.00; Dix, Fremont Bergan, 1.07; Hite, Lincoln Northeast, 1.24; Chavis, Omaha Northwest, 1.50; Henderson, Omaha Westside, 1.56; Hagan, Omaha Westside, 1.58; Allen, Omaha Central, 1.75; Horn, Papillion-La Vista South, 1.75; Walters, Lincoln East, 1.80; Luth, Elkhorn South, 1.86; McNeil, Lincoln High, 1.91; Melvin, Grand Island, 1.95; Chudomelka, Bellevue East, 1.97; Wize, Omaha Burke, 2.00.

Class B: Shaw, Hastings, 0.00; Creech, Hastings, 0.00; Mensik, Crete, 0.00; Washburn, Platte Valley, 0.00; Jensen, Central City, 0.00; Olson, Omaha Concordia, 0.00; Sukup, Seward, 0.00; Eischeid, Wayne, 0.00; Brown, Waverly, 0.00; Hegge, Thurston-Cuming County, 0.64; Lukowski, Omaha Skutt, 0.70; Zabokrtsky, Beatrice, 0.74; Schultz, Norris, 0.91; Bahl, Papillion-La Vista, 0.93; Rump, Arlington, 0.95; Fitzpatrick, Omaha Roncalli, 1.05; Lanik, Waverly, 1.11; Randazzo, Elkhorn, 1.17; Reiser, Waverly, 1.31; Rolenc, Seward, 1.47; Rosenbaum, Blair, 1.56; Hoffman, Beatrice, 1.80; Holman, Nebraska City, 1.83; Eggert, Plattsmouth, 1.85; Wibbels, Hastings, 1.90; Kilzer, Ralston, 1.91; Lewis, Platte Valley, 1.98.

Strikeouts

Class A: Colbert, Papillion-La Vista, 27; Hagan, Omaha Westside, 25; Luth, Elkhorn South, 24; Mason, Gretna, 23; Sanders, Grand Island, 21; Wize, Omaha Burke, 21; Riedel, Millard West, 21; Mendez, Millard North, 20; Diederich, Elkhorn South, 20; Warner, Omaha Burke, 18; Woodard, Bellevue West, 18; Brockett, Elkhorn South, 18; McNeil, Lincoln High, 18; Chudomelka, Bellevue East, 17; Gradoville, Millard North, 17; Groskreutz, Kearney, 17; Palmer, Columbus, 17; Kroeger, Omaha Northwest, 16; Sides, Papillion-La Vista South, 16; Whitehill, Papillion-La Vista, 16; Novak, Millard South, 16; Jelkin, Bellevue West, 16; Brazda, Bellevue West, 16.

Class B: Wibbels, Hastings, 42; Urbom, Branched Oak, 27; Lewis, Platte Valley, 24; Rump, Arlington, 24; Vater, Beatrice, 23; Williams, Nebraska City, 22; Olson, Omaha Concordia, 22; Washburn, Platte Valley, 20; Kozal, Waverly, 19; Black, Branched Oak, 19; Wylder, Waverly, 18; Johnson, Platteview, 18; Kniefl, Wayne 18; Reiser, Waverly, 17; Hegge, Thurston-Cuming County 17; Mensik, Crete, 17; Heser, Omaha Skutt, 17; Rasmussen, Central City, 17; Richards, Platteview, 17.

Class A: Folkers, Millard South, 2; Lemon, Bellevue West, 2; Barry, Millard South, 2.

Class B: Creech, Hastings, 3; Brown, Waverly, 3.

Dodgers’ Early Season Statistics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly – Dodgers Way

Dodgers’ Early Season Statistics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly - Dodgers Way nevin manimala
Dodgers’ Early Season Statistics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly - Dodgers Way nevin manimala

LOS ANGELES, CA – AUGUST 05: Corey Seager #5 of the Los Angeles Dodgers steals second base before Marwin Gonzalez #9 of the Houston Astros can make the tag in the eighth inning at Dodger Stadium on August 5, 2018 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by John McCoy/Getty Images)

The Dodgers have begun the 2019 season red hot. The back-to-back National League champions are considered the best team in baseball by many major outlets to this point in the season.

And yet there are some shortcomings. For all of the success, the Dodgers have had this season both at the plate and on the mound, as of April 11, the Dodgers are a mere 8-6 and are behind the San Diego Padres in the NL West by half a game.

This begs the question: Why? Why are the Dodgers behind the Padres when they are considered the best team in baseball and are scoring runs at a nearly unmatched clip? That’s what I was wondering.

In this article, I break down the good, bad, and downright ugly statistics the Dodgers have compiled to this point this season, and comment on what the team will have to do better and do differently in order to separate themselves from the pack.

Scientists build a machine to see all possible futures

Scientists build a machine to see all possible futures statistics, science, nevin manimala
Scientists build a machine to see all possible futures statistics, science, nevin manimala

In the 2018 movie Infinity War, a scene featured Dr. Strange looking into 14 million possible futures to search for a single timeline where the heroes would be victorious. Perhaps he would have had an easier time with help from a quantum computer. A team of researchers from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) and Griffith University in Australia has constructed a prototype quantum device that can generate all possible futures in a simultaneous quantum superposition.

“When we think about the future, we are confronted by a vast array of possibilities,” explains Assistant Professor Mile Gu of NTU Singapore, who led development of the quantum algorithm that underpins the prototype “These possibilities grow exponentially as we go deeper into the future. For instance, even if we have only two possibilities to choose from each minute, in less than half an hour there are 14 million possible futures. In less than a day, the number exceeds the number of atoms in the universe.” What he and his research group realised, however, was that a quantum computer can examine all possible futures by placing them in a quantum superposition — similar to Schrödinger’s famous cat that is simultaneously alive and dead.

To realise this scheme, they joined forces with the experimental group led by Professor Geoff Pryde at Griffith University. Together, the team implemented a specially devised photonic quantum information processor in which the potential future outcomes of a decision process are represented by the locations of photons — quantum particles of light. They then demonstrated that the state of the quantum device was a superposition of multiple potential futures, weighted by their probability of occurrence.

“The functioning of this device is inspired by the Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman,” says Dr Jayne Thompson, a member of the Singapore team. “When Feynman started studying quantum physics, he realized that when a particle travels from point A to point B, it does not necessarily follow a single path. Instead, it simultaneously transverses all possible paths connecting the points. Our work extends this phenomenon and harnesses it for modelling statistical futures.”

The machine has already demonstrated one application — measuring how much our bias towards a specific choice in the present impacts the future. “Our approach is to synthesise a quantum superposition of all possible futures for each bias.” explains Farzad Ghafari, a member of the experimental team, “By interfering these superpositions with each other, we can completely avoid looking at each possible future individually. In fact, many current artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms learn by seeing how small changes in their behaviour can lead to different future outcomes, so our techniques may enable quantum enhanced AIs to learn the effect of their actions much more efficiently.”

The team notes while their present prototype simulates at most 16 futures simultaneously, the underlying quantum algorithm can in principle scale without bound. “This is what makes the field so exciting,” says Pryde. “It is very much reminiscent of classical computers in the 1960s. Just as few could imagine the many uses of classical computers in the 1960s, we are still very much in the dark about what quantum computers can do. Each discovery of a new application provides further impetus for their technological development.”

Story Source:

Materials provided by Nanyang Technological University, College of Science. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

UK national statistics agency set for funding boost – Financial Times

UK national statistics agency set for funding boost - Financial Times nevin manimala
UK national statistics agency set for funding boost - Financial Times nevin manimala

Britain’s national statistics agency is set for a funding boost to improve measurement of the modern economy and provide early warning signals of any recession, the Chancellor announced on Friday.

The Office for National Statistics will be given £9m to pay for the development of new indicators and techniques to model growth following concerns that official figures are no longer appropriate for an increasingly digital and services-driven economy.

“Our modern economy is rapidly changing and it is vital we have the data and tools to understand it,” said Philip Hammond, chancellor. “Funding for new data scientists, improving our statistics and harnessing the power of big data will help us to quickly identify and address the challenges of the new economy and seize the opportunities that lie ahead.”

The increase in funding follows a 2016 review of UK economic statistics by Charlie Bean, a former Bank of England official. The report criticised the national statistics agency for failing to adapt to the digital economy and the slow pace of adoption of new data sources.

Official statistics had failed to account for the growth of services such as Uber and Airbnb which allow households to temporarily rent out their cars and houses, the report said, meaning that Britain was richer and faster-growing than figures suggested.

Friday’s funding will be used to develop “superfast indicators” of economic activity based on big data sets, the Treasury said. The ONS has already previewed new indicators based on value added tax returns, traffic flows and ship movements that it says could quickly alert policymakers to any recession.

The money will also be used to introduce a “double-deflation” method of calculating national income, that could help shine a light on Britain’s low rate of productivity growth by providing a better picture of how different industries have expanded over the past decade.

Since the Bean review the government has established an Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence to research how to measure the economy, while the ONS has established a data science campus in its headquarters in Newport.

Some of the new funding would go towards training an additional 500 government data scientists by 2021, the Treasury said.

“Recent investment in the ONS has driven some important new developments in the measurement of our rapidly evolving economy,” said John Pullinger, the UK’s national statistician. “The continuing support of HM Treasury will enable the next stage in our transformation of the UK’s key economic indicators.”

Dealership Statistics That Every Dealer Should Know – http://cbtnews.com/

Dealership Statistics That Every Dealer Should Know - http://cbtnews.com/ nevin manimala

It’s so easy to get caught up in the daily grind of the workday at your dealership. Each day brings new opportunities to improve your operations, attract new customers, and set yourself apart from competitors. However, have you ever wondered how other dealers are managing their operations? Have you been curious about consumer trends or buying habits? Statistics allow you to establish benchmarks and gauge the ever-changing patterns of consumer tastes.

Dealership Statistics That Every Dealer Should Know - http://cbtnews.com/ nevin manimalaSo, it is crucial to know recent statistics related to all functional areas in your dealership. However, we also understand that it can be a challenge to find the time to do this. So, we are here to help! Below are a collection of vital stats and information you should be aware of. We have divided them by category, so you can quickly locate the information you need.

Vehicle Sales and Pricing

  • Over 16,500 franchised dealerships sold 17.22 million vehicles in 2018. (Source)
  • The sales of total new vehicles topped $1 trillion. (Source)
  • Dealerships sold an average of 1,000 light vehicles from 2012 to 2016. (Source)
  • Ford sold the most cars in 2018, with almost 2.5 million units sold. (Source)
  • As of February, the average price of a new vehicle is $36,590, a nearly $1,000 increase from the same time last year. (Source)

Takeaway: Vehicle prices are rising, but consumers are still making purchases on par with previous years.

Service Repairs

  • Last year, dealerships wrote more than 310 million repair orders, with services and parts totaling more than $116 billion. (Source)
  • The service and parts department at U.S. franchised dealerships averaged a little over 12 percent of new vehicle dealership sales. Overall this accounted for $6.79 million of revenue in 2017. (Source)
  • From 1996 to 2016, the average age of passenger cars that were in operation in the U.S. was 11.6 years. (Source)

Takeaway: Consumers are driving vehicles for more extended periods; this seems to be providing an expansive opportunity for dealerships to capitalize on service repairs.

Car Buying Process

  • Forty-percent of buyers feels that the total price of the vehicle is more important than the monthly payment. (Source)
  • In general, those are leasing a car, female shoppers, younger consumers, and lower-income buyers are more concerned about the monthly price. (Source)
  • For car buyers, 60 percent of the process occurs online (typically as research). (Source)
  • The top two sites for online car buying were third-party sites (78 percent) and dealer’s pages (53 percent). (Source)
  • The most common initial point of contact with dealers is through walk-ins at 49 percent with phone calls coming in second at 26 percent. (Source)
  • Only 46 percent of car buyers are satisfied with the length of the purchasing process. (Source)
  • Fifty-four percent of consumers would buy from a dealership that offers their preferred experience even if it did not have the lowest price. (Source)

Takeaway: Even though more customers are shopping online than ever, phone and in-person interactions are still vital to the car buying process. However, consumers are looking for more efficiency while visiting dealerships.

Marketing

  • The average cost of an automotive lead is a little more than $200. (Source)
  • It’s all about search! Seventy-six percent of new and used vehicle shoppers run a search before buying a car. (Source)
  • Callers convert 30 percent faster than web leads. (Source)
  • Twenty-two percent of automotive shoppers used social media as a source while shopping for new vehicles. The two most popular mainstream social networking sites were YouTube (13 percent) and Facebook (five percent). (Source)
  • Regarding marketing, dealerships are most concerned with increasing lead volume and conversions. (Source)
  • Fifty-seven percent of incoming calls to dealerships are true prospects. (Source)
  • If staff follows-up after a mishandled call, 25 percent of those contacted will convert. (Source)

Takeaway: If you are looking to upgrade your marketing strategy, SEO, video marketing, and phone responses are where you should target your efforts.

The automotive industry is—and likely always will be—a titan for the American economy. For the foreseeable future, there will always be a need for cars (whether new or used). This situation puts dealers in the position of consistently being in demand. However, the challenge is finding the right audience, and creating processes that put information about your dealership in front of those that need it.

These statistics can help you see what is going on across the country, and what buyers are looking for in their next car buying experience. In addition to the data above, here are some additional data resources to check into. Knowing this information will allow you to create strategies that set you apart from the competition, and create a unique experience for customers.  

Statistics surprise regarding gaping | Opinion | dailyitem.com – Sunbury Daily Item

Statistics surprise regarding gaping | Opinion | dailyitem.com - Sunbury Daily Item nevin manimala
Statistics surprise regarding gaping | Opinion | dailyitem.com - Sunbury Daily Item nevin manimala

Vaping, or e-cigarette use, is an electronic method of inhaling flavors. Most people, myself included, do not consider burning leaves to be flavorful, but that is outside the scope of this article.

Recently there has been data regarding vaping which has been widely distributed. The conclusions could be used as a case study in how to identify an abuse of statistics. You may have heard that teen use of vaping is “at a record high,” and that the long-term effects of vaping are “uncertain,” and many are “deeply concerned.” There is “some evidence” which “may” point to “harm.” “Data suggests” vaping “may” encourage switching to smoking. Wording like this has the signs of trying to mislead, while still being technically correct.

I smell the incineration of the truth.

Yes, teen vaping has increased. The rate of gain is shocking because the numbers were low to start with. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. has gone from 5% of students who vaped in 2013, to 16% percent in 2015 — a 300 percent increase! Yet these statistics leave a lot of meaningful information hidden in the back of the filing cabinet — and some powerful interests would like to keep it that way.

According to the CDC’s National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), conventional cigarette use among teens has dropped 53% between 2009 and 2017. The smoking rate overall is at 14%, the lowest since the CDC began keeping such records in 1965. So if vaping is causing people to pick up smoking, it sure has a funny way of going about it, which is to say it isn’t, at least in any meaningful way in comparison to the number of people who are quitting smoking.

The CDC reports less than 6% of respondents didn’t already smoke before starting to vape. In fact they found that 67% of vapers smoked cigarettes for greater than 10 years prior to vaping.

A survey of more than 4,000 vape users conducted by VapeWild shows that 9 out of 10 vapers have tried to quit smoking more than once.

No one should think that it is wise to breathe in the chemicals used in vape equipment. Propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, nicotine, and chemical flavorants, are not as good for your lungs as plain air. But what if the alternative is tobacco smoke? A study performed by the Royal College of Physicians in London concluded, “the hazard to health arising from long-term vapor inhalation from the e-cigarettes available today is unlikely to exceed 5% of the harm from smoking tobacco.”

A study by the CDC concluded, “e-cigarettes are twice as effective at getting smokers to quit as government-approved smoking cessation products like the nicotine patch.” When Queen Mary University of London conducted a similar study, they reached the same conclusion.

The Pennsylvania Senate passed SB396, and the House passed HB97, both of which would make vaping, and the use of nicotine patches in school, illegal. The bills refer to vapes as Electronic Nicotine Delivery systems, or ENDS, however, the vaping flavors used do not always contain nicotine. In fact, over half of student vapers report not using any nicotine at all.

To reiterate, the lesser-known vaping facts: The explosion in the use of vapes comes almost exclusively at the expense of traditional tobacco. The results so far show that vaping is vastly superior to tobacco for one’s health. And vaping has been proven effective in helping people kick the habit.

So what is the government trying to save us from this time?

Big tobacco is scared witless at the sudden loss of revenue and has teamed up with governments, equally concerned over the plummeting sin-tax receipts from decreasing tobacco sales. Thus, PR firms were hired, and the war drums came out for the vapes: Your health is of no concern. Big tobacco and big government are more addicted to your money than the public is to nicotine.

If you expect government to behave rationally, you would expect they might propose a reasonable tax levied on the amount of nicotine in the vaping fluids, right? Actually, six states are proposing taxes on vaping equipment at over 70%, whether the product involves delivering nicotine or not. Pennsylvania is at 40% today. Legislation has been proposed in Utah and Washington which would tax vaping equipment at a whopping 95%. It’ll never pass, you say? Minnesota already has such a tax.

This appears to be yet another unholy alliance of corporate and government interests. This time they are working hand-in-hand to keep their tax gravy train rolling, even if doing so will place millions of Americans into an early grave.

John Burd, resident of Coal Township.

statistics; +711 new citations

statistics; +711 new citations Report, nevin manimala
statistics; +711 new citations Report, nevin manimala

Wandeler G, Mauron E, Atkinson A, Dufour JF, Kraus D, Reiss P, Peters L, Dabis F, Fehr J, Bernasconi E, van der Valk M, Smit C, Gjærde LK, Rockstroh J, Neau D, Bonnet F, Rauch A; Swiss HIV Cohort Study, Athena Observational Cohort Study, EuroSIDA, ANRS CO3 Aquitaine Cohort.

J Hepatol. 2019 Apr 6. pii: S0168-8278(19)30226-0. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.03.032. [Epub ahead of print]

Connect with Nevin Manimala on LinkedIn
Nevin Manimala SAS Certificate

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 – Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ – Hashed Out by The SSL Store™

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala
80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimalaLoading…

Cyber attacks have never been more prevalent than they will be in 2019

It’s an interesting and challenging time to be working in the cyber security industry. By and large, research indicates that cybercrime is on the rise — news headlines support these findings as major companies like Marriott, Equifax, Yahoo, and Facebook find themselves in the crosshairs of cyber attacks. Even sacrosanct governmental election processes the world over are not excluded from falling prey to cybercriminals and are a part of the increasing statistics about cyber security and cyber attacks.

In this article, we’ll present you with essential cyber security statistics but also want to take a moment to recognize that this incredibly broad category encompasses many areas of concern for individuals, IT security professionals, and business leaders alike. This range of topics include everything from cyber security vulnerabilities such as unpatched software and expired security certificates to the costs of cyber security attacks to the number of businesses that implement adequate (or inadequate) cybersecurity measures and policies. Cyber security statistics also includes a variety of other topics, but we have neither the time (nor the attention span) to cover all of them in one article. So, we’ll limit it to several categories but will cover other areas in a future article.

So, what numbers have made our list of the 80 top cyber security statistics for 2019? Let’s hash it out.

Cyber security statistics: The cybersecurity industry overall and its economic outlook

While it’s vital to stay abreast of the most recent cyber security attack statistics and information, it’s also important to be aware of general statistics about cyber security as an industry overall, including its economic outlook. Depending on where you stand on the side of the cyber security market, the following statistics paint a positive or bleak outlook for your business concerning industry gender representation, profitability, or the mounting costs of protecting your business, customers, and data: 

1 – $1.5 trillion cybercrime economy
The cybercrime economy has grown to enjoy at least $1.5 trillion in profits each year.

2 – 300 billion cybersecurity Market
The value of the cyber security market is anticipated to reach $300 billion by 2024, according to a 2019 press release by Global Market Insights, Inc.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

3 – $15 billion in cyber security funding
According to the 2019 President’s Budget released by the White House, the U.S. government plans to spend on cybersecurity-related activities this year — a 4.1% increase ($583.4 million) over the 2018 budget. However, according to the budget document, the caveat is that “Due to the sensitive nature of some activities, this amount does not represent the entire cyber budget.”

4 – 9% increase in cyber security spending
Despite data breaches rising at inordinate rates each year, Juniper Research’s Cybercrime & the Internet of Threats 2018 report anticipates cyber security spending will only increase by 9% on average per company, per annum.

5 – Small businesses invest <$500 per year in cyber security products
The average amount small businesses spend on consumer-grade cyber security products each year, according to Juniper Research’s 2018 study. This constituted 13% of the overall cybersecurity market that year.

6 – Women anticipated to make up 20% of the cybersecurity workforce
Cybersecurity Ventures estimates that women will represent 20% of the global cybersecurity workforce by the end of the year, according to a company press release.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

7 – 20% of CISOs anticipated to be women in 2019
Women are anticipated to hold 20% of Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) roles in the cybersecurity workforce by the end of the year, according to Forrester’s Cyber Predictions for 2019. This number is up from 13% in 2017.

8 – 49.6 day period between breach discovery and reporting dates
The average number of days between when a data breach was discovered and reported was nearly 50 days in 2018, according to a report from security intelligence vendor Risk Based Security (RBS).

9 – >70% of cryptocurrency transactions for illegal activity
The percentage of all cryptocurrency transactions predicted to be used for illicit activity is anticipated to be 70% by 2021, according to the Cybersecurity Almanac 2019 by Cybersecurity Ventures.

10 – Security breaches up >11%
The percentage by which security breaches have increased over the past year, according to the Ninth Annual Cost of Cybercrime global study by Accenture.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

11 – Security breaches increased by 67%
Over the past five years, security breaches have increased by 67%, according to Accenture’s global survey.

12 – SMBs are targeted 43% of the time
SCORE reports that 43% of cyber attacks target small businesses.

13 – Ransomware attacks occur every 14 seconds
The frequency in which Cybersecurity Ventures predicts that a business will fall victim to a ransomware attack this year in its 2019 Official Annual Cybercrime Report (ACR). The company also estimates that number will increase to every 11 seconds by 2021.

Cyber security statistics: The costs of cyber security attacks

The costs and damages that result from unaddressed cyber security vulnerabilities are, by no means, chump change. Cyber security attacks statistics should be an eye-opener for every company — particularly those that operate under the assumption (or with the hope) that a cyber attack will never happen to them. Anyone who thinks that their company — no matter how small or large — is not at risk because they lack cyber security vulnerabilities is fooling themselves. Simply put, as technologies evolve and cyber criminals become more advanced, it is a matter of when, not if cyber security attacks will occur.

Here are some of the cyber security statistics relating to the costs of cybercrime and cyber security attacks:

14 – Cybercrime damages to reach $6 trillion annually
Cybercrime damages are anticipated to cost businesses and organizations $6 trillion annually by 2021, according to the 2019 ACR from Cybersecurity Ventures. This number, which is up from the company’s 2015 estimate of $3 trillion in cybercrime damages annually, “represents the greatest transfer of economic wealth in history, risks the incentives for innovation and investment, and will be more profitable than the global trade of all major illegal drugs combined.”

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

15 – Ransomware damage estimated to reach $20 billion globally
The Cybersecurity Ventures annual crime report indicates that the same costs will reach $11.5 billion annually this year and $20 billion per year by 2021. Unsurprisingly, this type of year-over-year increase in anticipated damages makes ransomware the fastest-growing type of cybercrime in the past year.

16 – Cybercrime costs organizations $13 million per year
The average cost of cybercrime for an organization is estimated to be $13 million per year, according to Accenture’s global study.

17 – $1 cybercrime tools and kits
Cybercrime tools and kits can be purchased for as little as $1 on the Dark Web and online marketplaces, according to the Cybersecurity Almanac 2019 by Cybersecurity Ventures.

Cyber security statistics: Victim data and compromised records — by the numbers

When we’re talking about victims of cyber security attacks[, we’re referring to individuals, companies, and other organizations that are targeted or victimized in some way. The goal for cyber criminals is often to acquire information — personal information, names, addresses, financial and other account information, passwords, trade secrets, intellectual property, etc. — that can be used, traded, or sold on the Dark Web. They accomplish these goals through a variety of methods such as phishing and spear phishing emails, URL hijacking, structured query language (SQL) injections, and man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks, as well as a litany of other methods. 

In some cases, the goal is purely financial — they seek to manipulate and trick targeted employees into making large wire transfers to fraudulent accounts through business email compromise (BEC) and CEO fraud attack tactics. Why should the modern criminal go through the hassle of trying to rob a bank the old-fashioned way when they can get the employees at virtually any company to fork over thousands or even millions of dollars to them unwittingly?  

Here is a glimpse of top cyber security threat statistics and cyber attack information relating to compromised victims and records:

18 – USA is No. 1
While this is something many Americans are usually proud to chant, in this case, it’s not necessarily a positive attribute. The United States holds first place in the ranks of the top countries that are targeted cyber security attacks, according to Norton Security.

19 – 12 Breaches Results in +100 million exposed sensitive records
All it took was 12 data breaches to expose 100 million (or more) sensitive records in 2018, according to RBS’s report. These 12 breaches accounted for nearly three-quarters of all records exposed that year.  

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

20 – 60% of Americans exposed to fraud schemes
Sixty percent of Americans report they or an immediate family member have been victims of a scheme to defraud, according to research from The Harris Poll and the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). 

21 – 23% of Americans are cybercrime victims
Nearly one-quarter of surveyed Americans reported they or someone they know were victimized by cybercrime in 2018, according to Gallup’s annual crime survey.

22 – 31% of security professionals organizations victims of OT cyber attacks
Early one-third of surveyed security professionals say their organizations have experienced cyber attacks on operational technology (OT) infrastructure, according to Cisco’s 2018 Security Capabilities Benchmark Study that was published in its 2018 Annual Cybersecurity Report.

23 – Reported cybercrime victims only 10-12% of total
Donna Gregory, unit chief at the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), estimated that only 10-12% of all U.S. cybercrime victims were reported in 2016, according to a New York Times article.

24 – 76% of organizations and businesses were phishing targets
The number of organizations that were targeted by phishing attempts in 2017, according to Wombat Security’s State of the Phish 2018 report.

25 – 33 billion records will be stolen
This is the number of records that Juniper Research’s Cybercrime & the Internet of Threats 2018 report estimates cybercriminals will steal annually by 2023.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

26 – 146 billion records will be exposed in data breaches
The number of records Juniper Research’s 2018 report also estimates will be exposed by criminal data breaches between 2018 and 2023. The report specifies this number represents actual data breaches and not just reported data breaches. 

27 – 88% of companies with >1 million folders don’t limit access
According to a global study of 130 organizations by Varonis, 88% of the companies with more than 1,000,000 folders lack appropriate access limitations — leaving 100,000 folders open to everyone (all employees). The report also indicates that 58% of the companies they surveyed have more than 100,000 folders accessible to all employees.

28 – 41% of companies allow all employees access to > 1,000 sensitive files.
Varonis’s report indicates that 41% of the companies they surveyed have more than 1,000 sensitive files (those containing credit card information, health records, and personal information that is subject to regulatory compliance) open to all employees.

Cyber security statistics: Key cyber attack statistics by industry

Defining cyber security attacks can be difficult depending on how specific or generic you want to be in your definition. As such, trying to find the “top cyber attack methods” for each industry is virtually impossible because sources and researchers will define such attacks in different ways. For example, phishing emails can involve malware attacks, so researchers can choose to define them by either method.

With these considerations in mind, we’ve limited ourselves to highlighting just a few of the cyber security attack statistics relating to various industries:

29 – Ransomware attacks to increase 5X by 2021
The Cybersecurity Almanac 2019 from Cybersecurity Ventures estimates that ransomware attacks against healthcare organizations will increase by this amount between 2017 and 2021. This isn’t all that surprising considering that healthcare ranks 15th out of 18 U.S. industries with regard to cybersecurity and research shows that hospital employees open one of every seven phishing emails.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

30 – 48% of UK manufacturers are cybercrime targets
Nearly half of the surveyed manufacturers in the United Kingdom reported being victims of cybercrime or a cyber security incident at some point, according to a report by Make UK and AIG that was carried out by the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).

31 – 38.4% of mining industry users receive malicious emails
According to Symantec’s Internet Security Threat Report (ISTR) 2019 report, 38.4% of users in the mining industry were targeted with malicious emails.

32 – 1 in 302 emails targeting public administration users are malicious
Email users working in the public administration sector receive one malicious email for every 302 emails they receive, according to Symantec’s ISTR 2019 report.

33 – >20 ATM malware families now exist
According to Kaspersky Lab, there are now more than 20 ATM malware families that pose threats to the banking and finance industry.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

Cyber security statistics: Top data breaches of 2018 and 2019 (so far)

Cyber security research and reports from the past several years indicate that cyber attacks are rapidly increasing and the number of new attacks will surpass those of previous years. Here are some cyber security attacks that were reported in 2018 and 2019: 

34 – Personal info of 1.5 billion Indian citizens exposed in Aadhaar data breach
The personal information of 1.5 billion Indian citizens (photographs, national ID numbers, phone numbers, addresses, postal codes, and email addresses) was exposed in a massive data breach of the nation’s ID database that was discovered in March 2018.

35 – 1.16 billion email addresses and passwords exposed
The number of “unique combinations of email addresses and passwords” that was discovered in 2019 in a massive breach called “Collection 1.” This load of information was discovered by an IT security researcher and is thought to be the largest breach in history to date, according to an article by Fortune.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

36 – 540 million Facebook users exposed in breach announced in 2019
More than half a billion records about Facebook users were publicly exposed in two app datasets that were digitally stored in two Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) storage buckets, according to a 2019 announcement by UpGuard.

37 – Marriott breach exposes 500 million user accounts
This statistic reflects the number of user accounts that were exposed in a data breach of Marriott’s Starwood guest database, which was disclosed in 2018.

38 – 340 million contacts exposed in Exactis data breach
The personal information of 340 million U.S. consumers and business contacts was exposed on a publicly accessible server by Exactis, a marketing and data aggregation firm, according to a report by CNET. 

39 – 200 million user accounts exposed via Fortnite cyber security vulnerability
The number of Fortnite user accounts were exposed when hackers took advantage of an old, unsecured website page to send phishing emails. The flaw was reported in Check Point Research’s January 2019 announcement.

40 – 30 million users exposed in 2018 Facebook data breach
In 2018, 30 million Facebook users were affected by another data breach, according to Consumer Reports. Nearly half (14 million) of those users’ sensitive information was accessed, and the names and contact information of another 15 million were also exposed.

Cyber security statistics: Most common types of cyber attacks

Cyber security attacks are some of the fastest-growing crimes in the world — especially for businesses and organizations in the United States. (Juniper Research estimates that the U.S. companies and organizations will be the targets of more than 50% of all cyber attacks by 2023.) As such, there are a lot of statistics in this area that we can cover, including a breakdown of some of the top cyber security threats and a list of some of the most common types of cyber attacks.

In terms of cyber security threats statistics, we’ve put together a list which includes DDoS attack statistics, malware attack statistics, man-in-the-middle attack statistics, phishing-related statistics, and web application attacks and vulnerabilities:

DoS and DDoS attack statistics

Although the methods and scale of each attack differ, the ultimate goal of denial of service (DoS) and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks is the same: The aim is to flood a resource or targeted system to deny access to those who need it. 

Internet of Things (IoT) devices are frequently compromised and added to botnets, then used to launch ongoing distributed denial of service malware and brute-force attacks that use common usernames and passwords. As the IoT market continues to grow and more devices are being used across virtually all industries, we anticipate the year’s cyber security statistics will continue to reflect increasing cyber attacks and exploits of this technology in 2019.   

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

41 – 20.4 billion
The anticipated number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices that will exist by 2020, according to a press release from Gartner, Inc. 

42 – Routers account for 75% of infected devices in IoT attacks
Routers accounted for 75% of IoT attacks in 2018, and connected cameras accounted for 15% of them.

43 – The largest DDoS attack on record: 1.7 TBPS 
The largest DDoS attack on record, according to NETSCOUT Threat Intelligence Report from the second half of 2018, was a 1.7 terabytes per second (TBPS) reflection/amplification attack against a U.S.-based service provider. To provide you with perspective, Netflix recommends five megabits per second for streaming high definition (HD) quality shows and 25 megabits per second for streaming ultra HD quality shows. Eight megabits is equal to one megabyte per second, and one million megabytes is equal to one terabyte. This means that the victim was targeted with an attack using the demand equivalent of streaming 200,000 HD TV shows, or 40,000 ultra HD TV shows, simultaneously.

44 – DoS or DDoS attack could cost enterprises $2 million
According to the Annual Cyber Security Report 2019 report from Bulletproof, a DoS or DDoS attack could cost an enterprise company more than $2 million or up to $120,000 for a small company.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

45 – IoT devices typically attacked within 5 minutes
Five minutes is the average amount of time it takes for an IoT device to be attacked once plugged into the Internet, according to a report from NETSCOUT.

46 – China accounted for more than 50% of DDoS attacks in Q4 2018
The percentage of distributed denial of service attacks that originated in China in Q4 2018 fell to 50.43% from 77.67%, according to Kaspersky’s DDoS Q4 Report. The United States came in second with nearly 25% and Australia in third with 4.5%.

47 – $20 price tag for DDoS attacks
The low cost per target to purchase a DDoS attack ranging from 290 to 300 gigabits per second, according to an ARS Technica article.

Malware attack statistics

According to an article by Security Magazine, one in 50 emails contain some form of malicious content. As we turn our attention to malware attacks, it is an area of attack that shows no sign of slowing in 2019. Digital Trends estimates that 10% of all malicious emails contain malware such as ransomware, spyware, adware, or trojans. Here are some additional cyber security statistics to help increase your understanding of this growing issue:[

48 – 1,000% increase in malicious PowerShell scripts
The use of malicious PowerShell scripts increased 1,000% in 2018, according to Symantec’s ISTR 2019 report

49 – Email responsible for spreading 92% of all malware
CSO Online estimates that email is the primary method of malware delivery

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

50 – Office files constitute 48% of malicious email attachments
Forty-eight percent of malicious email attachments were Microsoft iOffice files in 2018, according to Symantec’s ISTR 2019 report.“.Doc” or “.dot” files represented 37% of malicious email attachments.

51 – Mobile ransomware jumped 33% last year
In 2018, the prevalence of mobile ransomware increased by 33%, according to Symantec’s ISTR 2019 report.

52 – Enterprise ransomware increased 12% in 2018
Last year, enterprise ransomware increased 12%, according to Symantec’s ISTR 2019 report.

53 – Scripts represent 47.5% of malicious email attachments
Nearly 48% of malicious email attachments are scripts, according to Symantec’s ISTR 2019 report.

Man-in-the-middle attack statistics

Man-in-the-middle attacks are, essentially, the modern form of old-fashioned eavesdropping. However, it’s not that simple — MitM attacks also include the use of content injection or alteration as well as other tactics. Here are some cyber security statistics relating to MitM attacks and methods:

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

54 – 95% of HTTPS servers vulnerable to MitM
According to Netcraft, MitM attacks were thought to pose a threat to 95% of HTTPS servers in 2016.

55 – MitM attacks were involved in 35% of exploitations
More than one-third of exploitation of inadvertent weaknesses involved MitM attacks, according to IBM’s X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2018.

56 – 10% of companies implement HSTS
Only 10% of companies have implemented HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) for websites, according to research from W3Techs.

Phishing statistics

By and large, phishing leads the pack when it comes to the most common types of cyber attacks against businesses. Cofense, formerly PhishMe, reports that 91% of cyber attacks start with a spear-phishing email. Here are some additional phishing statistics that you should know:[

57 – SaaS-mimicking phishing attacks increased 237%
Phishing attacks mimicking Software-as-a-Service platforms increased 237% in 2017, according to Phish Labs’s 2018 Phishing Trends & Intelligence Report.

58 – BEC costs U.S. companies $12.5 billion
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported $12.5 billion in losses to companies between October 2013 and May 2018 due to business email compromise (BEC).

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

59 – U.S. target of 86% phishing attacks
Phish Labs reports that 86% of phishing attacks targeted U.S. victims.

60 – 83% of infosec professionals experienced phishing attacks in 2018
Eighty-three percent of global information security respondents experienced phishing attacks in 2018, according to ProofPoint’s State of the Phish 2019 Report.

61 – Phishing, pretexting represent 98 and 93% of social incidents and breaches
Verizon’s 2018 Data Breach Incident Report states that “phishing and pretexting represent 98% of social incidents and 93% of breaches.”

Web application attacks and vulnerabilities

Web applications — everything from calculators and Google docs to webmail platforms and dynamic websites — are vulnerable to a variety of attack methods such as SQL injections, formjacking, and brute force attacks. According to a report by Imperva:

“The overall number of vulnerabilities in 2018 (17,308 increased by 23% compared to 2017 (14,082) and by 162% compared to 2016 (6,615)… more than half of web application vulnerabilities have a public exploit available to hackers. In addition, more than a third (38%) of web application vulnerabilities don’t have an available solution, such as a software upgrade workaround or software patch.”

Web application vulnerabilities create opportunities for hackers to launch devastating attacks. Hackers launch many types of web application cyber attacks — TrustWave reports the two most common attack method as cross-site scripting (XSS), which constituted about 40% of web attack attempts, and SQL injections (24%).

The following is a list of key cyber security statistics relating to web application attacks and vulnerabilities:

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

62 – 46% of websites have high cyber security vulnerabilities
Acunetix’s Web Application Vulnerability Report 2019 reports that websites have 46% high and 87% medium security vulnerabilities.

63 – SQL injection and cross-site scripting saw a 38% increase
“Application-layer attacks such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting” increased 38%, according to Akamai’s Summer 2018 State of the Internet/Security: Web Attack report.

64 – Formjacking compromised 4,818 websites monthly in 2018
The average number of websites compromised by formjacking code each month in 2018 was 4,818, according to Symantec’s ISTR 2019 report.

65 – 2% of web applications susceptible to RCE
Acunetix’s Web Application Vulnerability Report 2019 indicates that 2% of its sampled web application targets were vulnerable to remote code execution, which allows a malicious user to execute virtually any code within a web application.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

66 – Two TLS vulnerabilities decrease to 0% and 3%
As TLS version 1.3 becomes more prevalent, old SSL and TLS vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed and POODLE (affecting TLS versions up to 1.2) have decreased across the internet or become virtually nonexistent, dropping to 0% and 3% of websites respectively, according to Acunetix’s Web Application Vulnerability Report 2019.

67 – 75% of LAN penetration due to web application weaknesses
Three-quarters of network penetration vectors resulted from poor web application security protections, according to a 2019 report on vulnerabilities in corporate information systems by Positive Technologies.

Cyber security statistics: Compliance with cyber security industry best practices

Ideally, every company, government, and organization should follow industry best practices to ensure their IT infrastructure, data, and customer information are secure. However, we’ve long since come to realize that expectations and reality are often two very different things. Recent research indicates that most companies lack adequate data protections and have not implemented cyber security best practices. This leaves them vulnerable to data loss, financial costs, and reputational harm.

Here is our list of some of the most enlightening recent cyber security statistics we could find concerning compliance issues and industry best practices:

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

68 – Only 2% of IT budget is used for security
ZDNet reports that only 2% of companies’ IT expenditure last year was used on security measures.

69 – 70% of employees don’t understand cybersecurity
The percentage of U.S. employees who lack a basic understanding of cybersecurity best practices is estimated to be 70%.

70 – 32% of U.S. companies failed to properly implement SSL/TLS
High-Tech Bridge reports that 32% of U.S. companies (16% of European companies) received failing grades for their implementations of SSL/TLS encryption, according to High-Tech Bridge’s report.

71 – 52.5% companies compliant with PCI DSS requirements
More than 50% of companies were estimated to be fully compliant with interim PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) requirements in 2017, according to Verizon’s 2018 Payment Security Report.

72 – 30% of the world’s top websites unsecure
Whynohttps.com estimates that 30% of the world’s top 560 websites are not secure. These sites include ESPN.com, BBC.com, Wikia.com, MyShopify.com, Chegg.com &NBA.com.

73 – 93% of companies report implementing password rules
Of the 93% of companies that report having password rules, fewer than 25% require mandatory password changes and 53% require quarterly changes, according to data cited by TechRepublic in a OneLogin survey.

74 – Outdated and unpatched software constitutes 22% of security issues
According to BulletProof’s 2019 report, 22% of the high and critical-risk issues reported consisted of missing patches, out-of-date or no longer supported software.

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

75 – 68% of business don’t have cyber security insurance
More than two-thirds of businesses neglect to purchase cyber liability or data-breach insurance coverage, according to a Cisco’s 2018 Cyber Security and Insurance paper.

76 – 68% don’t have a disaster recovery plan in place
More than two-thirds of small business owners lack a disaster recovery (DR) plan, according to a study by Nationwide. The company also reports that 71% of small business owners do not purchase business interruption insurance.

77 – 45% of companies have a uniform encryption strategy or plan
Fewer than half of surveyed companies report having an encryption plan or strategy that is applied consistently across their enterprises, according to the Ponemon Institute’s 2019 Global Encryption Trends Study for nCipher Security.

78 – 73% of companies have minimum cyber security requirements for vendors
The percentage of organizations that now require third-party vendors to meet minimum cyber security requirements, according to a BDO USA’s 2018 cyber governance survey

79 – 95% of employees/end users receive phishing training
We’re happy to share that 95% of survey respondents report training employees/end users to identify and avoid phishing attacks, according to ProofPoint’s State of the Phish 2019 Report

80 Eye-Opening Cyber Security Statistics for 2019 - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ - Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ nevin manimala

80 – 60% of organizations use cloud technology for sensitive or confidential data
Almost two-thirds of respondents for the Ponemon Institute/nCipher Security survey say their organizations transfer confidential or sensitive information to the cloud regardless of whether the data is encrypted or made unreadable.

While there are many other cyber security statistics out there relating to the industry, attacks, and vulnerabilities, we can’t cover all of them in one single post. However, many aspects of these statistics will be covered in future Hashed Out blog posts. Be sure to keep an eye out for our upcoming blog post on the topic of the 2019 cybercrime statistics in particular.

Final thoughts

While cybercriminals represent a significant threat to companies, organizations, and governments alike, it’s easy to see that they are not the only threats or even the biggest ones. In most cases, the critical threats to organizations are their own lack of adequate defenses and employees who are ignorant of cyber threats. Organizations can reduce their risks of cyber attacks by following industry best practices and implementing key defense measures such as employee training and the use of encryption.

What are some of the important and recent cyber security statistics that you’ve discovered? As always, we invite you to leave any comments or questions in the comments section below.