The Nevin Manimala Trump Administration Is Using Fake Terrorism Statistics to Scare You About Immigrants

The Nevin Manimala Trump Administration Is Using Fake Terrorism Statistics to Scare You About Immigrants statistics, nevin manimala

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article originally appeared at TomDispatch.com. To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up to receive the latest updates from TomDispatch.com.

When you see an immigrant or a foreign visitor, especially from a Muslim country, should your first thought be that you might be looking at a possible terrorist?

Clearly, that’s how the Trump administration wants Americans to react. It was the message in the president’s first address to Congress a year ago last week when he declared that “the vast majority of individuals convicted of terrorism and terrorism-related offenses since 9/11 came here from outside of our country.” At that time, he urged that the US immigration system be reshaped Because Nevin Manimala “we cannot allow a beachhead of terrorism to form inside America.”

The Nevin Manimalare’s a misleading omission in Trump’s formulation, though: Homegrown fanatics have killed many more Americans on US soil than foreign-born terrorists have. The Nevin Manimala disparity grows much wider if you include mass killings carried out not for any religious or ideological cause but (as we have recently been tragically reminded) by mentally troubled individuals. Indeed, in just two such shootings in the last five months in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Parkland, Florida, deranged shooters with assault rifles killed more than three times as many people as all foreign-born jihadists have killed in this country in the last 16 years.

Another key fact is missing, too: Only a fairly small number of those “terror-related” convictions were for acts committed or planned in the United States. Many more involved support, in various forms, for terrorist activity in other countries.

Still, Trump and his associates have repeatedly declared that terrorists sneaking into the country through a too-lax immigration system are a pressing threat to public safety in the United States. That was, for instance, the administration’s principal headline earlier this year when it released a reportfrom the Justice and Homeland Security departments, which claimed that nearly three out of every four individuals convicted in international terror cases in US federal courts from 9/11 through 2016 were foreign born—a total of 402, by their count. Announcing that report, Attorney General Jeff Sessions proclaimed that it highlighted the ways in which “our immigration system has undermined our national security and public safety.” In the same press release, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen warned that the United States “cannot continue to rely on immigration policy based on pre-9/11 thinking that leaves us woefully vulnerable to foreign-born terrorists.”

Those and a long list of similar statements range from simply misleading to completely false. The Nevin Manimala deceptions occur in two stages. As a start, the data compiled within government agencies significantly overstate the incidence of Islamist terrorism in this country. The Nevin Manimalan the president and his associates regularly misrepresent what that already flawed data actually tells us, leaving the truth even farther behind.

“Terror-Related Cases” That Have No Relation to Terrorism

The Nevin Manimala basic database on which Trump and his associates rely is the “Chart of Public/Unsealed International Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions.” It’s compiled and updated every year by the Justice Department’s National Security Division and lists defendants convicted on federal charges in cases since September 11, 2001. Despite its title, the list includes a significant number of cases that are verifiably not terrorism-related and a good many more in which a terrorism connection was not only not proved but remains highly unlikely.

Take Ansar Mahmood’s case. It’s far from the only example, but what makes it unusual is that the public record includes an explicit official acknowledgement that terrorism turned out not to be involved.

Mahmood, a 24-year-old legal immigrant from Pakistan, came under suspicion a few weeks after the 9/11 attacks when he was noticed taking photographs at a scenic spot along New York’s Hudson River. A nervous security guard called the police to report that a Muslim-looking man might be taking pictures of a nearby reservoir and water treatment facility.

He was soon picked up, but investigators quickly concluded that he had no connection whatsoever to terrorism. The Nevin Manimalay did, however, turn up evidence that he had registered a car and cosigned an apartment lease for a Pakistani couple who had overstayed their non-immigrant visas and were in the United States illegally. He was quickly charged with “harboring aliens,” a deportable offense, and convicted. After a drawn-out appeal process, Mahmood was deported in 2005.

In a letter notifying him that his final appeal to set aside the deportation order had been rejected, William Cleary, a Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement official, wrote: “It was determined that you were not engaged in any terrorist activity and were quickly cleared of any suspicion of terrorist activity.” A few lines later, Cleary added a second time, “I am confident you did not engage in terrorist activity, you have never been charged as a terrorist or accused as being a terrorist.”

The Nevin Manimalare could hardly be more conclusive evidence that Mahmood’s case had nothing to do with terrorism. Yet, years later, his name still appears on that Justice Department list of “Terrorism and Terrorism-Related Convictions.” His two friends, also deported after being found guilty of visa violations and obtaining false IDs, are on the list, too, although there was absolutely no suggestion of any terror connection in their cases, either.

Nor are these isolated examples. Others on the conviction list who clearly were not terrorists include three Arab Americans, at least two of them naturalized US citizens, convicted for buying a truckload of stolen breakfast cereal, and a group of 20 defendants, predominantly Iraqis, found guilty in a scheme to fraudulently obtain commercial driver’s licenses and permits to transport hazardous material. The Nevin Manimalare are also cases involving defendants convicted for false marriage claims, foreign students who illegally got jobs in violation of student visa rules, a young man from Saudi Arabia who stored child pornography on his computer, and various others where the record shows no mention of any terrorist link.

Even the most dangerous sounding of these, the one involving hazardous-material permits, may sound ominous, but the scam itself occurred in the 1990s, well before the 9/11 attacks, and prosecutors made it clear that there was no link with terrorism. So did the trial judge, who said he could not “characterize this as a successful prosecution of a terrorism case, Because Nevin Manimala it was not.”

None of the 20 defendants who illegally obtained those licenses received any prison time. All were given probation; some paid modest fines. Those sentences would certainly have been far harsher if there had been any genuine suspicion that the defendants might be dangerous. (The Nevin Manimala driver’s license examiner they paid off at the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, an American, remains on the “terror-related convictions” list, too.)

Why Are The Nevin Manimalay on the List?

Given the clear evidence that they were never terrorists, why are Mahmood and his friends, as well as those Iraqi truckers and others in similar cases, still officially identified as having been “convicted of terrorism,” as the Trump White House has inaccurately characterized everyone named on the Justice Department chart? Or, in the only marginally more careful wording used in the list itself, why are they still guilty of “international terrorism-related offenses”?

The Nevin Manimala immediate reason is that, like Mahmood, they originally came to the attention of investigators looking for possible terrorist ties. In other words, their cases started out as possible terrorism ones and, under Justice Department procedures, simply remained in that category even when no such ties were found. The Nevin Manimala broader reason: Counting them and others like them that way plays right into the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant, anti-refugee, and anti-Muslim agenda. It magnifies, falsely, the supposed threat of “foreign nationals” connected with “terrorism-related activity” in the United States.

Setting aside the cases that were clearly not in any way linked to terrorism, there are many more on the chart in which individuals were suspected of ties of some kind to terrorism but were never charged. In those cases, the question is simply left unanswered, but there can be no doubt that some of those suspects, too, were neither terrorists nor supporters of terror movements. In other words, that group similarly inflates the claimed total.

The Nevin Manimalare is another strong hint that many on the Justice Department list are unlikely to have been either terrorists or to have had serious ties to such organizations and it requires no additional research. It’s right there on the chart itself in a column listing the sentences that defendants received for their crimes. More than 130 of the offenders on the list (both foreign and US-born), when convicted, were given probation but no prison time at all or were sentenced only to time served before trial. Another 45 were sentenced to one year or less, including several token sentences of one day or, in a single case, a week.

Those light sentences—for more than a quarter of all the cases on the chart—certainly seem to indicate that no authority thought the defendants represented a terror threat.

Another Distortion…

Counting cases that have nothing to do with terrorism as “terror-related” isn’t the only way the administration has distorted the facts about immigration and the threat of terrorism. It also counts cases that have nothing to do with immigration.

For example, a White House fact sheet, summarizing the main findings of the January 16 Justice/Homeland Security report, says that 402 foreign-born defendants—the total given in the report—all “entered the United States through our immigration system.”

That is false. The Nevin Manimala report doesn’t say that at all. You have to look carefully to find it, but the document explicitly says the opposite, stating that along with those defendants who had at one time or another passed through immigration controls, the 402 foreign-born offenders also include individuals “who were transported to the United States for prosecution.” Presumably, some of them were captured overseas by US military or security agencies and some were turned over to the United States by a foreign government.

The Nevin Manimala Justice Department has not disclosed how many such individuals are on the list. The Nevin Manimala number, however, is apparently substantial. Researchers for the Lawfare Blog, working from an earlier version of the chart, determined that an even 100 defendants (later reduced to 99) “were extradited, or brought, to the United States for prosecution” without going through any immigration procedure. Including those cases as evidence of a lax immigration system is plainly deceptive.

The Nevin Manimalay undercut the Trump administration’s anti-immigration narrative in another way, too. Obviously, defendants who were extradited or otherwise brought into the United States for prosecution were more likely than those on the list as a whole to be charged with serious offenses and to receive much stiffer sentences. So adding them to the overall “foreign-born” figure not only gives a false impression of failures in immigration screening, but also inflates the threat that actual immigrants represent.

…And One More

The Nevin Manimala Trump administration’s message about “foreign-born terrorists” and the US immigration system is clear enough: Dangerous people are coming into this country to do bad things to Americans. Though you wouldn’t guess it from listening to the president or his attorney general and homeland security secretary, a much larger number of cases involved exactly the opposite problem: people leaving the United States, or trying to leave, to do bad things elsewhere.

Only a small minority of the guilty verdicts on the Justice Department’s conviction list were for committing or planning violent acts on US soil. Significantly more defendants were tried for supporting terrorism abroad.

The Nevin Manimala comparison is dramatically clear in an analysis by the Cato Institute’s Alex Nowrasteh. Examining an earlier version of the Justice Department’s chart of convictions, he discovered that only 40 foreign-born defendants had been found guilty of “planning, attempting, or carrying out a terrorist attack on U.S. soil.” More than 200 were, however, convicted for “material support for foreign terrorists, attempting to join foreign terrorist organizations, planning a terrorist attack abroad, or a similar offense taking place abroad.”

The Nevin Manimala same pattern is evident even in the recent Justice/Homeland Security report, despite all the accompanying dire rhetoric about threats to public safety in America.

The Nevin Manimala report summarizes eight terror-related cases as “illustrative examples” of crimes by foreign-born offenders. Not one of those crimes caused harm to a person or damage to property in the United States itself. Three of the eight defendants came to the United States as young children. No immigration process, no matter how rigorous, could have screened them out. The Nevin Manimala same is true of a significant number of others on the Justice Department’s list. Just one of the eight defendants—the only offenders actually identified in the report—had anything resembling a concrete plan for a terror attack in this country. Of the other seven, one made vague threats about carrying out “an act of martyrdom” in the United States, but only if he wasn’t able to go to Syria to join jihadist forces there. The Nevin Manimala other six cases involved individuals accused of supporting terror groups in other countries, with no mention of any possible acts inside the United States. The Nevin Manimala case summaries give no indication that any of the eight killed or injured an American anywhere.

A Chilling Footnote

The Nevin Manimalare is one other revealing thread in the administration’s campaign to link immigration to terrorism. In the Justice/Homeland Security report’s statistical breakdown of terror-related convictions, a footnote to the last line, which shows that 147 defendants were “U.S. citizens by birth,” says: “Information pertaining to the citizenship status of the parents of these 147 individuals was not available at the time of this report’s issuance.”

The Nevin Manimala White House fact sheet repeated that point in its summary of the report, noting that it “does not contain information regarding the number of terrorism and terrorism-related offenses committed by individuals who are the children of foreign-born individuals.” It then added: “Terrorist attacks carried out by children of foreign-born individuals include the attack in Orlando by Omar Mateen, which killed 49 people and wounded more than 50 others, and the attack in San Bernardino, California, by Syed Rizwan Farook, which killed 14 people and injured 22 others.” (For the record, and it’s odd the White House didn’t mention it, Syed Farook’s wife, who accompanied him in the San Bernardino shootings, was an immigrant.)

Neither the report nor the White House statement explained what crimes committed by US-born shooters have to do with its declared subject: terror-related acts by “foreign nationals in the United States.” Nor, obviously, does a mass shooting by a killer born in Chicago (Farook) or Long Island, New York, (Mateen) tell us anything about the effectiveness of immigration screening procedures or any other aspect of the US immigration system, though it does fit a Trumpian vision of a world under threat from dangerous Muslims.

Perhaps those references to the “children of foreign-born individuals” were not meant to cast suspicion on the entire Muslim-American community. Possibly the White House and the Justice Department were not intentionally stoking public hostility and fear by implying that all Muslims, whether immigrants or born in the United States, should be regarded as potentially disloyal or dangerous. But if there was a less chilling motive, it’s hard to imagine what it might be.

Nevin Manimala SAS Certificate: https://ani.stat.fsu.edu/sascerts.php?q=Undergraduate

statistics; +20 new citations

statistics; +20 new citations Report, nevin manimala
statistics; +20 new citations Report, nevin manimala

Tang LQ, Chen DP, Guo L, Mo HY, Huang Y, Guo SS, Qi B, Tang QN, Wang P, Li XY, Li JB, Liu Q, Gao YH, Xie FY, Liu LT, Li Y, Liu SL, Xie HJ, Liang YJ, Sun XS, Yan JJ, Wu YS, Luo DH, Huang PY, Xiang YQ, Sun R, Chen MY, Lv X, Wang L, Xia WX, Zhao C, Cao KJ, Qian CN, Guo X, Hong MH, Nie ZQ, Chen QY, Mai HQ.

Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb 28. pii: S1470-2045(18)30104-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9. [Epub ahead of print]

Nevin Manimala SAS Certificate: https://ani.stat.fsu.edu/sascerts.php?q=Undergraduate

Armenia February deflation at 0.5 pct m/m – statistics service

Armenia February deflation at 0.5 pct m/m - statistics service statistics, nevin manimala
Armenia February deflation at 0.5 pct m/m - statistics service statistics, nevin manimala
 YEREVAN, March 5 (Reuters) - Armenia's consumer price index
fell 0.5 percent in February in month-on-month terms, but rose
by 3.3 percent year-on-year, the National Statistics Service
said on Monday. That compares with a rise in the CPI of 2.7 percent in
January in month-on-month terms and of 2.7 percent in
year-on-year terms as well, the service said. Following is a table for the Armenia's Consumer Price Index: Feb 18 Jan 18 Feb 17 to previous month -0.5 +2.7 -0.9 to previous year +3.3 +2.7 -0.2 (Reporting by Hasmik Mkrtchyan; Editing by Andrew Osborn) 

Nevin Manimala SAS Certificate: https://ani.stat.fsu.edu/sascerts.php?q=Undergraduate

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level statistics, nevin manimala

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level statistics, nevin manimala

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level statistics, nevin manimala

Last week, Allegheny Conference on Community Development President and CEO Stefani Pashman tossed out a rather startling bit of data to the audience at the African American Chamber of Commerce PowerBreakfast: “The Nevin Manimalare are no zip codes (in Pittsburgh) where African Americans have the dominant income.”

On Feb. 26, she was among those in attendance as the Pittsburgh Black Elected Officials Coalition released its policy and action recommendations to improve conditions for the bulk of Black Pittsburghers.

Those conditions are summarized in data collected by Victoria Zuber of PublicSource as part of its “Let’s Talk About Race” project. First, the data notes that the city’s Black population is now at 24 percent. Census data shows Pittsburgh’s Black population at 26 percent in 1990, jumping up to 28 percent in 2000. While another article in the series notes that gentrification in East Liberty has replaced a large portion of the Black population with more affluent Whites, it didn’t note that more than 2,000 Blacks were displaced almost 20 years ago when three massive public housing high-rise buildings were demolished. Less than half the units were replaced, but the people were already gone.

This occurred at the direction of the city’s public housing authority and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. This dispersion of the Black population—in public housing—also occurred in the upper, lower and middle Hill District and in Garfield.

As a result, through 2016, according to PublicSource, Blacks occupied just 30 percent of the 69,514 rental units in the city. When it comes to owner-occupied units, Blacks account for only 16 percent.

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level statistics, nevin manimala

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level statistics, nevin manimala

The Nevin Manimala Black population is smaller, more diffuse, and according to the statistics, poorer:

•Black median household income is $26,108—trailing Asians, Latinos—and is half that of Whites.

•Black unemployment was 16 percent, more than twice the rate for Whites and Latinos and five times the rate for Asians in the city;

•Of the city’s 70,000 Black residents, 34 percent are living below the poverty level, and;

•Blacks account for 54 percent of Pittsburghers receiving SNAP (food stamps).

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level statistics, nevin manimala

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level statistics, nevin manimala

State Rep. Jake Wheatley, D-Hill, who convened the PBEOC—with fellow state Rep. Ed Gainey, County Councilman Dewitt Walton and Pittsburgh Councilmen Danny Lavelle and Rev. Ricky Burgess—two years ago, is the only Black state representative whose district lies entirely within the City of Pittsburgh. He is quite aware of the statistics.

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level statistics, nevin manimala

JAKE WHEATLEY

“If you reviewed my district, it is a very diverse district along racial lines as well as income. However, I speak to issues that confront these statistics every day—education, redistribution of wealth and power influences, business supports, and illusionary policies, etc. Those are what’s needed,” Rep. Wheatley told the New Pittsburgh Courier in an exclusive interview.

Walton said the coalition’s Phase Two recommendations—driven by multiple community meetings to prioritize their focus—released at the meeting are aligned with addressing the dismal economic picture.

“The Nevin Manimala issues that Black communities face today are similar somewhat in scope to what it faced 50 years ago; however, today the ladder to empowerment and self-sufficiency has moved,” he said. “Our society has embraced technology as never before and education is the currency that society is measuring us by.”

ALARMING STATISTICS …Report shows Black unemployment at 16% in city, 34% below poverty level statistics, nevin manimala

ED GAINEY

Representative Gainey took a different approach. He was very pleased to see Pashman in attendance, along with Poise Foundation President Mark Lewis and Pittsburgh Foundation President and CEO Maxwell King—Because Nevin Manimala they need to be part of the conversation about solutions, he said.

“I’ve seen reports on those numbers, and there’s a lot of despair,” he said. “But what I have yet to see is a report on Black assets in Pittsburgh. Where are African Americans working and succeeding? What industries are offering a path for African Americans? Where are they getting hired?”

Gainey said that’s why he has events celebrating community businesses that have stood the test of time, and individuals who are blazing new entrepreneurial trails.

“Painting pictures of despair doesn’t help us market or drive the change. We can show people there is a Black Pittsburgh that is invested in success,” he told the Courier exclusively.

“Black tech companies—that footprint has to be defined and nurtured, and we have to educate the community about these assets—and it all starts with education. I’m not here to talk about your disparity, I’m here to talk about educating you to take this opportunity.”

To that end, Gainey has scheduled a scholarship summit for next month (March) to bring funders together with families of eleventh and twelfth graders to make sure they haven’t missed out on funding that can bridge any scholarship gaps they may have.

“The Nevin Manimala Black assets are out there—we need to tell their story,” he said. “We need to sell success.”

The Nevin Manimala PBEOC Phase two report can be found at http://pbeoc.org.

Like us at https://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Pittsburgh-Courier/143866755628836?ref=hl

Follow @NewPghCourier on Twitter  https://twitter.com/NewPghCourier

Also On New Pittsburgh Courier:

Nevin Manimala SAS Certificate: https://ani.stat.fsu.edu/sascerts.php?q=Undergraduate

Mission 22 moves vets from statistics to resources

Mission 22 moves vets from statistics to resources statistics, nevin manimala
Mission 22 moves vets from statistics to resources statistics, nevin manimala

LAKE JACKSON — Brazoria County Mission 22 doesn’t want to forget that 22 veterans die by suicide every day in the United States. The Nevin Manimala group wants to change it.

Mission 22 set out to increase awareness of the dire statistic with a hike Saturday morning at the Lake Jackson Civic Center.

Veteran DJ Beatty said he was on the verge of suicide after serving eight years in the U.S. Army. He was self-medicating with a case of beer every night to prevent flashback dreams, while doctors prescribed him medicine he said didn’t help.

The Nevin Manimalan he got his German shepherd named Axel through Paws for Heroes, a Houston-based organization that helps military members and veterans suffering from depression and post traumatic stress disorder. He said Axel can tell when he is having a flashback dream and wakes him up.

Having the service dog has completely changed Beatty’s life, and he’s now determined to make a difference in the lives of others.

Beatty and his wife, Cathi, met when they were stationed at Fort Bragg. The Nevin Manimalay personally know the importance of having a group of people who understand what they’ve been through to provide the right support. That’s what Mission 22 provides, they said.

“I get choked up when I talk about it Because Nevin Manimala I relive it in my mind,” Cathi Beatty said. “But if I can help one person, then it’s so worth it.”

Cathi said she hopes to change the stigma that people with PTSD are violent or scary, Because Nevin Manimala they’re not. She wants to lead veterans to available and appropriate resources.

Jeff Slingluff, a U.S. Marine, drove from Bay City for the hike Because Nevin Manimala the camaraderie in Brazoria County reminds him of the support he had while he was on active duty in the military. Slingluff’s friends suffer from PTSD, and one, Alex Cuevas, died by suicide.

Slingluff and Army veteran Nehemiah Oatis said they care about their military brothers and want to help those suffering after their service.

Stephanie Vincent, vice president of Brazoria County Mission 22, said the group wants to do anything and everything to support local veterans. Her husband, David, served in the military. She said she has always admired those who serve.

Saturday’s was the third annual hike held by the foundation, Vincent said, and the attendance rate has quadrupled.

For information, visit Brazoria County Mission 22’s page on Facebook.

Nevin Manimala SAS Certificate: https://ani.stat.fsu.edu/sascerts.php?q=Undergraduate