J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 20. doi: 10.2196/38099. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Disease status-such as cancer stage-has been used in routine clinical practice to determine more accurate treatment plans. Health-related indicators, such as mortality, morbidity, and population group life expectancy, have also been used. However, few studies specifically focus on the comprehensive and objective measures of individual health status.
OBJECTIVE: The perspectives of the public toward 29 health indicators obtained from a literature review were analyzed to provide evidence for further prioritization of the indicators. The difference between health status and disease status should be considered.
METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional design. Online surveys were administered through Ohio University, ResearchMatch, and Clemson University, resulting in three samples. Participants included individuals aged ≥ 18 years. Participants rated the importance of the 29 health indicators. The rating results were aggregated, cleaned, and analyzed as follows: (1) to determine the agreement among the three samples regarding the importance of each indicator (IV = the three samples, DV = individual survey responses); (2) to examine the mean differences between the retained indicators with agreement across the three samples (IV = the identified indicators, DV = individual survey responses); and (3) to rank the groups of indicators into various levels after grouping the indicators with no mean differences (IV = the groups of indicators, DV = individual survey responses).
RESULTS: A total of 1,153 valid responses were analyzed. Descriptive statistics revealed that the top-five rated indicators were drug or substance abuse, smoking or tobacco use, alcohol abuse, major depression, and diet and nutrition. Among the 29 health indicators, the three samples agreed upon the importance of 13. Inferential statistical analysis indicated that some of the 13 indicators held equal importance. Therefore, the 13 indicators were categorized by rank into seven levels as follows: Level 1: blood sugar level and immunization/vaccination; Level 2: LDL cholesterol; Level 3: HDL cholesterol, blood triglycerides, cancer screening detection, and total cholesterol; Level 4: health literacy rate; Level 5: personal care needs and air quality index > 100; Level 6: self-rated health status and HIV testing; and Level 7: the supply of dentists. Levels 1-3 were rated significantly higher than Levels 4-7. Among the 13 health indicators, blood sugar level and immunization/vaccination status were the most important, and the supply of dentists was the least important.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a baseline for prioritizing 29 health indicators, which can be used by electronic health records or personal health record system designers or developers to determine what can be included in the systems to capture an individual’s health status. Currently, self-rated health status is used predominantly. Additionally, this study provides a foundation for tracking and measuring preventive healthcare services more accurately and developing an individual health status index.
PMID:35623051 | DOI:10.2196/38099